ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2023
Is the Citak classification of distal femur morphology age and gender dependent?
Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A novel radiological classification of the distal humerus: morphometric analysis across two European populations.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2026Article
- Ten key steps: How to successfully publish?Joint diseases and related surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe purpose of this study was to compare the distal femur morphology in different age and gender groups using the Citak classification. MATERIALS AND
methodsAll patients who had standard knee anteroposterior radiographs between 2010 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed using the electronic patient database. Patients were divided into three age groups as follows: young adults (Group I, younger than 50 years), middle-aged adults (Group II, ranging from age 51 to 73 years), and elderly (Group III, more than 74 years). From each age group, 80 patients were randomly selected with an equal number of gender (40 males/40 females). An age-stratified selection was applied to obtain the best sample that represents the selected age groups. Patients younger than 18 years of age, history of previous fracture or surgical procedure, those with fixation implants or prosthesis, and abnormalities of the lower limb, such as a congenital deformity, were excluded from the study. All measurements were performed by an experienced orthopedic surgeon familiar with the Citak classification. All measured variables were compared between age and gender groups.
resultsThere were 240 patients (120 male and 120 female) with a mean age of 59.6 ± 20.4 (range 18-95). The distal femur morphology index was similar (p:0.811), and the morphological types were equally distributed among age groups (p:0.819). Furthermore, there was no significant difference between genders on the measured variables (p > 0.05 for all variables). Citak classification types were similarly distributed between the genders (p:0.153). No correlation was found between age and the Citak index in either gender (p:0.967 and p:0.633, respectively).
conclusionsDistal femoral morphology classified by the Citak index is not age and gender dependent. Type C, which has a wider diaphyseal diameter, and is supposed to be more common in elderly subjects, was equally distributed in all age groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV. Retrospective case series.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37400672What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.