Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37400631›Full record

ReviewCurrent hematologic malignancy reports2023

Response-Adapted Therapy for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma.

Winnie Z Y Teo, Ian Y E Ong, Jason W Y Tong, Wan Li Ong, Adeline Lin, Fangfang Song, Bee Choo Tai, Melissa Ooi, Cinnie Yentia Seokojo, Yunxin Chen and 3 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current hematologic malignancy reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Winnie Z Y TeoDepartment of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Science Institute of Singapore (NCIS), National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
Ian Y E OngDepartment of Internal Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Jason W Y TongDepartment of General Surgery, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
Wan Li OngDepartment of General Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Adeline LinDepartment of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Science Institute of Singapore (NCIS), National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
Fangfang SongDepartment of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Science Institute of Singapore (NCIS), National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
Bee Choo TaiSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Melissa OoiDepartment of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Science Institute of Singapore (NCIS), National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
Cinnie Yentia SeokojoDepartment of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Science Institute of Singapore (NCIS), National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
Yunxin ChenSingHealth Duke-NUS Blood Cancer Centre, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Chandramouli NagarajanSingHealth Duke-NUS Blood Cancer Centre, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Wee Joo ChngDepartment of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Science Institute of Singapore (NCIS), National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
Sanjay de MelDepartment of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Science Institute of Singapore (NCIS), National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore. sanjay_widanalage@nuhs.edu.sg.ORCID 0000-0002-8881-3537

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe development of potent novel agents has improved outcomes for patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Heterogeneity of response to therapy, an expanding arsenal of treatment options, and cost are however major challenges for physicians making treatment decisions. Response-adapted therapy is hence an attractive strategy for sequencing of therapy in MM. Despite its successful application in other haematologic malignancies, response-adapted therapy is yet to become a standard of care for MM. We provide our perspective on response-adapted therapeutic strategies evaluated thus far and how they may be implemented and improved on in treatment algorithms of the future. RECENT

findingsWhile older studies suggested that early response based on International Myeloma Working Group response criteria could impact long-term outcomes, recent data have contradicted these findings. The advent of minimal residual disease (MRD) as a powerful prognostic factor in MM has raised the promise of MRD-adapted treatment strategies. The development of more sensitive techniques for paraprotein quantification as well as imaging modalities to detect extramedullary disease is likely to change response assessment in MM. These techniques combined with MRD assessment may provide sensitive and holistic response assessments which could be evaluated in clinical trials. Response-adapted treatment algorithms have the potential to allow an individualised treatment strategy, maximising efficacy, while minimising toxicities and cost. Standardisation of MRD methodology, incorporation of imaging into response assessment, and the optimal management of MRD positive patients are key questions to be addressed in future trials.

Indexed as

Hematologic NeoplasmsMultiple MyelomaDisease-Free SurvivalHumansNeoplasm, ResidualClinical trialsMinimal residual diseaseMultiple myelomaResponse-adapted therapy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.