ReviewNature methods2023
Minimum information guidelines for experiments structurally characterizing intrinsically disordered protein regions.
Review in Nature methods, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- DisProt in 2026: enhancing intrinsically disordered proteins accessibility, deposition, and annotation.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Integrative Multimodal Profiling of TAp73 and DNp73 Reveals Isoform-Specific Transcriptomic Coregulator Landscapes in Cancer Programs.Biomolecules · 2025Article
- Targeting protein disorder: the next hurdle in drug discovery.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2025Review
- The Role of ESS2/DGCR14: Is It an Essential Factor in Splicing and Transcription?International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Regularly updated benchmark sets for statistically correct evaluations of AlphaFold applications.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Fostering and sustaining collaborative innovation: Insights from ELIXIR Europe's life science Communities.F1000Research · 2025Article
- Best practices for the manual curation of intrinsically disordered proteins in DisProt.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2024Article
- The 2024 Nucleic Acids Research database issue and the online molecular biology database collection.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- DisProt in 2024: improving function annotation of intrinsically disordered proteins.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- The Origin of Discrepancies between Predictions and Annotations in Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.Biomolecules · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
Abstract
An unambiguous description of an experiment, and the subsequent biological observation, is vital for accurate data interpretation. Minimum information guidelines define the fundamental complement of data that can support an unambiguous conclusion based on experimental observations. We present the Minimum Information About Disorder Experiments (MIADE) guidelines to define the parameters required for the wider scientific community to understand the findings of an experiment studying the structural properties of intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs). MIADE guidelines provide recommendations for data producers to describe the results of their experiments at source, for curators to annotate experimental data to community resources and for database developers maintaining community resources to disseminate the data. The MIADE guidelines will improve the interpretability of experimental results for data consumers, facilitate direct data submission, simplify data curation, improve data exchange among repositories and standardize the dissemination of the key metadata on an IDR experiment by IDR data sources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37400558What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.