ArticleActa neurochirurgica2023
Is laminectomy necessary for C1-C2 epidural schwannomas?
Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSpinal schwannomas often require laminectomy for gross total resection. However, laminectomy may not be necessary due to the unique anatomy of epidural schwannomas at the C1-2 level, even with the intradural part. This study aimed to determine the need for laminectomy by comparing factors between patients who underwent laminectomy and those who did not and to identify the benefits of not performing laminectomy.
methodsFifty patients with spinal epidural schwannoma confined to C1-C2 level were retrospectively collected and divided into groups based on whether laminectomy was intended and performed. In all cases where laminectomy was conducted, patients underwent laminoplasty using microplate-and-screws, which deviates from the conventional laminectomy approach. Tumor characteristics were compared, and a cut-off value for laminectomy was determined. Outcomes were compared between groups, and factors influencing laminectomy were identified. Postoperative changes in cervical curves were measured.
resultsThe diameter of the intradural part of the tumor was significantly longer in the laminectomy performed group, with a 14.86 mm cut-off diameter requiring laminectomy. Recurrence rates did not differ significantly between groups. Surgery time was substantially longer for the laminectomy performed group. No significant changes were observed in Cobb's angles of Oc-C2, C1-C2, and Oc-C1 before and after surgery.
conclusionThe study showed that the diameter of the intradural part of the tumor influenced the decision to perform laminectomy for removing epidural schwannomas at C1-C2. The cut-off value of the diameter of the intradural part of the tumor for the laminectomy was 14.86 mm. Not performing laminectomy can be a viable option with no significant differences in removal and complication rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.