ArticleScientific reports2023
Physics-informed reinforcement learning for motion control of a fish-like swimming robot.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- From Biological Mechanisms to Task-Oriented Design Principles: A Critical Review of Fish-like Biomimetic Robots.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Optimization of potential targets for antidepressant Chinese medicines: AI and multi-omics methods.Chinese medicine · 2026Review
- Reinforcement Learning-Enabled Control and Design of Rigid-Link Robotic Fish: A Comprehensive Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Swimtrans Net: a multimodal robotic system for swimming action recognition driven via Swin-Transformer.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Motion control of fish-like swimming robots presents many challenges due to the unstructured environment and unmodelled governing physics of the fluid-robot interaction. Commonly used low-fidelity control models using simplified formulas for drag and lift forces do not capture key physics that can play an important role in the dynamics of small-sized robots with limited actuation. Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) holds considerable promise for motion control of robots with complex dynamics. Reinforcement learning methods require large amounts of training data exploring a large subset of the relevant state space, which can be expensive, time consuming, or unsafe to obtain. Data from simulations can be used in the initial stages of DRL, but in the case of swimming robots, the complexity of fluid-body interactions makes large numbers of simulations infeasible from the perspective of time and computational resources. Surrogate models that capture the primary physics of the system can be a useful starting point for training a DRL agent which is subsequently transferred to train with a higher fidelity simulation. We demonstrate the utility of such physics-informed reinforcement learning to train a policy that can enable velocity and path tracking for a planar swimming (fish-like) rigid Joukowski hydrofoil. This is done through a curriculum where the DRL agent is first trained to track limit cycles in a velocity space for a representative nonholonomic system, and then transferred to train on a small simulation data set of the swimmer. The results show the utility of physics-informed reinforcement learning for the control of fish-like swimming robots.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.