Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37400473›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Physics-informed reinforcement learning for motion control of a fish-like swimming robot.

Colin Rodwell, Phanindra Tallapragada

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
19.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Colin RodwellDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, 29634, USA.
Phanindra TallapragadaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, 29634, USA. ptallap@clemson.edu.
Clemson University · US

Funding

Office of Naval Research 13204704
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motion control of fish-like swimming robots presents many challenges due to the unstructured environment and unmodelled governing physics of the fluid-robot interaction. Commonly used low-fidelity control models using simplified formulas for drag and lift forces do not capture key physics that can play an important role in the dynamics of small-sized robots with limited actuation. Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) holds considerable promise for motion control of robots with complex dynamics. Reinforcement learning methods require large amounts of training data exploring a large subset of the relevant state space, which can be expensive, time consuming, or unsafe to obtain. Data from simulations can be used in the initial stages of DRL, but in the case of swimming robots, the complexity of fluid-body interactions makes large numbers of simulations infeasible from the perspective of time and computational resources. Surrogate models that capture the primary physics of the system can be a useful starting point for training a DRL agent which is subsequently transferred to train with a higher fidelity simulation. We demonstrate the utility of such physics-informed reinforcement learning to train a policy that can enable velocity and path tracking for a planar swimming (fish-like) rigid Joukowski hydrofoil. This is done through a curriculum where the DRL agent is first trained to track limit cycles in a velocity space for a representative nonholonomic system, and then transferred to train on a small simulation data set of the swimmer. The results show the utility of physics-informed reinforcement learning for the control of fish-like swimming robots.

Identifiers

PMID37400473
PMCPMC10318098
OpenAlexW4382931248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.