ArticleCancer genomics & proteomics
Localization of
Article in Cancer genomics & proteomics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- EGFRxCD16 bispecific antibodies orchestrate superior NK cell-mediated lysis of ovarian cancer and NSCLC cell lines in combination with oncolytic viruses.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2026Article
- A bibliometric analysis of nucleic acid probe and its applications in oncology: towards more precise molecular medicine.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- Localization of epidermal growth factor receptor-mutations using PNA:DNA probes in clinical specimens from patients with non-small cell lung cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Anti-cancer effects of Coix seed extract through KCTD9-mediated ubiquitination of TOP2A in lung adenocarcinoma.Cell division · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimEpidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling inhibitors are potent therapeutic agents for EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer, but the effects of such inhibitors on the localization of EGFR mutations in tumor tissues remain to be elucidated. Thus, a simple and efficient technology for the detection of mutations in tumor tissue specimens needs to be developed. MATERIALS AND
methodsUsing an EGFR mutation-specific peptide nucleic acid (PNA)-DNA probe, the EGFR mutation-positive part of whole NSCLC tissues was visualized by immunofluorescence. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections obtained from A549, NCI-H1975, HCC827 and PC-9 tumors transplanted into nude mice were subjected to staining using PNA-DNA probes specific for the mRNA sequences producing the L858R, del E746-A750 and T790M mutations.
resultsThe probes for the L858R mutation showed intense positive staining in H1975 cells, and the probe for the del E746-A750 mutation exhibited positive staining specifically in HCC827 and PC-9 tumors. On the other hand, A549 tumors without EGFR mutation did not show any significant staining for any PNA-DNA probe. In combination staining, the addition of cytokeratin stain increased the positive staining rate of each PNA-DNA probe. In addition, the positive staining rate of the probes for the L858R mutation was comparable to that of the antibody to EGFR L858R mutated protein.
conclusionPNA-DNA probes specific for EGFR mutations might be useful tools to detect heterogeneous mutant EGFR expression in cancer tissues and efficiently evaluate the effect of EGFR signaling inhibitors on tissues of EGFR-mutant cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.