ReviewThe Journal of pediatrics2023
Exclusion of Families Who Speak Languages Other than English from Federally Funded Pediatric Trials.
Review in The Journal of pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Inclusion of Participants With Limited English Proficiency in Autism Research.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2026Pooled it
- Pediatric Literacy Promotion for Latino Families by Texts and Referrals: A 3-Arm RCT.Pediatrics · 2026Trial
- Recruitment and Retention of Racially Minoritized Families in a Pediatric Behavioral Diabetes Research Study.Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings · 2026Article
- Beyond Words: A Call to Action for Language Inclusivity in Prospective Research.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Wait-List Controlled Pilot Trial of a Preventive Mental Health Intervention for Refugee Youth.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2025Article
- Persistent exclusion of non-English speakers in Pediatric research: a national analysis using ClinicalTrials.gov.Pediatric research · 2025Article
- Researcher Perceptions of Inclusion of Study Participants Who Use Languages Other Than English.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Multilingual Research Strategies to Enhance Equity.JAMA pediatrics · 2025Article
- "How Fluent Do I Need to Be to Say I'm Fluent?" Research Experiences of Communities that Speak Languages Other than English.Community health equity research & policy · 2025Article
- Can Open Science Advance Health Justice? Genomic Research Dissemination in the Evolving Data-Sharing Landscape.The Hastings Center report · 2024Article
- Voices unheard: Bridging language gaps, ensuring equity and inclusion of non-native speakers in health research and clinical trials.Nursing open · 2024Article
- Collecting Sociodemographic Data in Pediatric Emergency Research: A Working Group Consensus.Pediatrics · 2024Article
- Research with and Inclusive of Children in Immigrant Families: A Narrative Review of Methods and Approaches.Academic pediatrics · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo determine whether individuals in the United States who speak languages other than English (LOE) are excluded from federally funded pediatric clinical trials and whether such trials adhere to the National Institutes of Health policy regarding inclusion of members of minority groups. STUDY
designUsing ClinicalTrials.gov, we identified all completed, federally funded, US-based trials inclusive of children ≤17 and focused on one of 4 common chronic childhood conditions (asthma, mental health, obesity, and dental caries) as of June 18, 2019. We reviewed ClinicalTrials.gov online content, as well as published manuscripts linked to ClinicalTrials.gov entries, to abstract information about language-related exclusion criteria. Trials were deemed to exclude LOE participants/caregivers if explicit statements regarding exclusion were identified in the study protocol or published manuscript.
resultsOf total, 189 trials met inclusion criteria. Two-thirds (67%) did not address multilingual enrollment. Of the 62 trials that did, 82% excluded LOE individuals. No trials addressed the enrollment of non-English, non-Spanish-speaking individuals. In 93 trials with nonmissing data on ethnicity, Latino individuals comprised 31% of participants in trials that included LOE individuals and 14% of participants in trials that excluded LOE individuals.
conclusionsFederally funded pediatric trials in the United States do not adequately address multilingual enrollment, a seeming violation of federal and contractual requirements for accommodation of language barriers by entities receiving federal funding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.