Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37399510›Full record

ReviewEuropean heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging2023

The role of imaging in the selection of patients for HFpEF therapy.

Tomasz Baron, Spyridon Gerovasileiou, Frank A Flachskampf

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Next-generation molecular imaging of cardiac fibrosis.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tomasz BaronDepartment of Medical Sciences, Cardiology and Clinical Physiology, Uppsala University and Uppsala University Hospital, 751 85 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8290-557X
Spyridon GerovasileiouDepartment of Medical Sciences, Cardiology and Clinical Physiology, Uppsala University and Uppsala University Hospital, 751 85 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1823-1993
Frank A FlachskampfDepartment of Medical Sciences, Cardiology and Clinical Physiology, Uppsala University and Uppsala University Hospital, 751 85 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7401-278X
Uppsala University Hospital · SEUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) traditionally has been characterized as a form of heart failure without therapeutic options, in particular with a lack of response to the established therapies of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, this is no longer true. Besides physical exercise, risk factor modification, aldosterone blocking agents, and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, specific therapies are emerging for specific HFpEF etiologies, such as hypertrophic cardiomyopathy or cardiac amyloidosis. This development justifies increased efforts to arrive at specific diagnoses within the umbrella of HFpEF. Cardiac imaging plays by far the largest role in this effort and is discussed in the following review.

Indexed as

Heart FailurePatient SelectionStroke VolumeAgedCardiac Imaging TechniquesEchocardiographyFemaleHumansMalePrognosisRisk Assessmentcardiovascular magnetic resonanceechocardiographyheart failure therapyheart failure with preserved ejection fractionimagingnuclear imaging

Identifiers

PMID37399510
PMCPMC10531123
OpenAlexW4382931900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.