Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37399384›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2023

Ecoevolutionary processes structure milk microbiomes across the mammalian tree of life.

Mia M Keady, Randall R Jimenez, Morgan Bragg, Jenna C P Wagner, Sally L Bornbusch, Michael L Power, Carly R Muletz-Wolz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Neonatal infection withInfection and immunity · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mia M KeadyCenter for Conservation Genomics, Smithsonian National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute, Washington, DC 20008.ORCID 0000-0001-7919-0641
Randall R JimenezCenter for Conservation Genomics, Smithsonian National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute, Washington, DC 20008.ORCID 0000-0003-2832-5168
Morgan BraggCenter for Conservation Genomics, Smithsonian National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute, Washington, DC 20008.ORCID 0000-0002-7650-4868
Jenna C P WagnerNutrition Laboratory and Conservation Ecology Center, Smithsonian National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute, National Zoological Park, Washington, DC 20008.ORCID 0000-0002-9292-1514
Sally L BornbuschCenter for Conservation Genomics, Smithsonian National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute, Washington, DC 20008.ORCID 0000-0001-9996-8369
Michael L PowerNutrition Laboratory and Conservation Ecology Center, Smithsonian National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute, National Zoological Park, Washington, DC 20008.ORCID 0000-0002-6120-3528
Carly R Muletz-WolzCenter for Conservation Genomics, Smithsonian National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute, Washington, DC 20008.ORCID 0000-0001-5047-9601

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Milk production is an ancient adaptation that unites all mammals. Milk contains a microbiome that can contribute to offspring health and microbial-immunological development. We generated a comprehensive milk microbiome dataset (16S rRNA gene) for the class Mammalia, representing 47 species from all placental superorders, to determine processes structuring milk microbiomes. We show that across Mammalia, milk exposes offspring to maternal bacterial and archaeal symbionts throughout lactation. Deterministic processes of environmental selection accounted for 20% of milk microbiome assembly processes; milk microbiomes were similar from mammals with the same host superorder (Afrotheria, Laurasiathera, Euarchontoglires, and Xenarthra: 6%), environment (marine captive, marine wild, terrestrial captive, and terrestrial wild: 6%), diet (carnivore, omnivore, herbivore, and insectivore: 5%), and milk nutrient content (sugar, fat, and protein: 3%). We found that diet directly and indirectly impacted milk microbiomes, with indirect effects being mediated by milk sugar content. Stochastic processes, such as ecological drift, accounted for 80% of milk microbiome assembly processes, which was high compared to mammalian gut and mammalian skin microbiomes (69% and 45%, respectively). Even amid high stochasticity and indirect effects, our results of direct dietary effects on milk microbiomes provide support for enteromammary trafficking, representing a mechanism by which bacteria are transferred from the mother's gut to mammary gland and then to offspring postnatally. The microbial species present in milk reflect both selective pressures and stochastic processes at the host level, exemplifying various ecological and evolutionary factors acting on milk microbiomes, which, in turn, set the stage for offspring health and development.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaAnimalsBacteriaEutheriaFemaleMammalsMilkPlacentaPregnancyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16Sbacteriabreast milkmicrobiotaneonatesymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID37399384
PMCPMC10334807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.