Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37399338›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurointerventional surgery2024

Clinical results of 30 consecutive patients of carotid artery stenosis treated with CASPER stent placement: 1-year follow-up and in-stent findings on intravascular ultrasound examination immediately and 6 months after treatment.

Hiroyuki Matsumoto, Daisuke Izawa, Hirokazu Nishiyama, Yukie Nakayama, Kazuhide Maeshima

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurointerventional surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Carotid Antiembolic ("Mesh") Stents: Not Created Equal.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2024
    Article
  3. Intraprocedural and Delayed Plaque Protrusion in Carotid Artery Stenting Using a Dual-Layer Metallic Stent.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hiroyuki MatsumotoNeurological Surgery, Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital, Kishiwada, Osaka, Japan hiroyuki.matsumoto@tokushukai.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1520-3586
Daisuke IzawaNeurological Surgery, Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital, Kishiwada, Osaka, Japan.
Hirokazu NishiyamaNeurological Surgery, Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital, Kishiwada, Osaka, Japan.
Yukie NakayamaNeurological Surgery, Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital, Kishiwada, Osaka, Japan.
Kazuhide MaeshimaNeurological Surgery, Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital, Kishiwada, Osaka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe CASPER stent is expected to reduce periprocedural ischemic complications, but there is concern about restenosis in the early period. One-year follow-up results of CASPER stenting and findings on intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) immediately and 6 months after treatment are evaluated.

methodsThirty consecutive patients were treated with CASPER stents for carotid artery stenosis. IVUS was performed immediately after stenting, and MRI and carotid ultrasonography were performed the next day, at 1 week, at 2 weeks, and then every 3 months. One-year follow-up results were evaluated. Twenty-five patients underwent follow-up angiography and IVUS after 6 months and their findings were investigated.

resultsAll patients were treated without complications during the intraoperative and periprocedural periods. After 6 months, all 25 patients with follow-up angiography and IVUS showed various degrees of intimal formation on IVUS and 8 of them had ≥50% stenosis on angiography. Three of the 30 patients required retreatment within 6 months because of severe restenosis. In these patients, the inner layer of the stent was deformed toward the inside due to intimal hyperplasia on follow-up IVUS, and there was dissociation between the inner and outer layers. All but the 3 of 30 patients with 1-year follow-up did not lead to symptomatic cerebrovascular events or retreatment.

conclusionsThe CASPER stent appears to be effective for preventing periprocedural ischemic complications. IVUS showed various degrees of intimal formation within 6 months after treatment, and it is possible that the CASPER stent is structurally prone to intimal formation or hyperplasia.

Indexed as

Carotid StenosisStentsUltrasonography, InterventionalAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeAngioplastyCervicalStentUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID37399338
PMCPMC11228187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.