Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37399327›Full record

ReviewBiopolymers2024

Conformational fluctuations and phases in fused in sarcoma (FUS) low-complexity domain.

D Thirumalai, Abhinaw Kumar, Debayan Chakraborty, John E Straub, Mauro L Mugnai

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biopolymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Droplet growth, Ostwald's rule, and emergence of order in Fused in Sarcoma.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

D ThirumalaiDepartment of Chemistry, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1801-5924
Abhinaw KumarDepartment of Chemistry, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4417-4825
Debayan ChakrabortyDepartment of Chemistry, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4339-5818
John E StraubDepartment of Chemistry, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2355-3316
Mauro L MugnaiInstitute for Soft Matter Synthesis and Metrology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0267-2279

Funding

Probing the roles of membrane and cholesterol on Aβ biogenesis and prion protein interactionsR01GM107703 · NIGMS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI STRAUB, JOHN E., THIRUMALAI, DEVARAJAN · 2015 to 2022
$2.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM107703NIH HHS GM-107703
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The well-known phenomenon of phase separation in synthetic polymers and proteins has become a major topic in biophysics because it has been invoked as a mechanism of compartment formation in cells, without the need for membranes. Most of the coacervates (or condensates) are composed of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins (IDPs) or regions that are structureless, often in interaction with RNA and DNA. One of the more intriguing IDPs is the 526-residue RNA-binding protein, Fused in Sarcoma (FUS), whose monomer conformations and condensates exhibit unusual behavior that are sensitive to solution conditions. By focussing principally on the N-terminus low-complexity domain (FUS-LC comprising residues 1-214) and other truncations, we rationalize the findings of solid-state NMR experiments, which show that FUS-LC adopts a non-polymorphic fibril structure (core-1) involving residues 39-95, flanked by fuzzy coats on both the N- and C-terminal ends. An alternate structure (core-2), whose free energy is comparable to core-1, emerges only in the truncated construct (residues 110-214). Both core-1 and core-2 fibrils are stabilized by a Tyrosine ladder as well as hydrophilic interactions. The morphologies (gels, fibrils, and glass-like) adopted by FUS seem to vary greatly, depending on the experimental conditions. The effect of phosphorylation is site-specific. Simulations show that phosphorylation of residues within the fibril has a greater destabilization effect than residues that are outside the fibril region, which accords well with experiments. Many of the peculiarities associated with FUS may also be shared by other IDPs, such as TDP43 and hnRNPA2. We outline a number of problems for which there is no clear molecular explanation.

Indexed as

Intrinsically Disordered ProteinsSarcomaHumansMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyPhosphorylationProtein ConformationProtein DomainsRNA-Binding Protein FUSFUS protein, humanIntrinsically Disordered ProteinsRNA-Binding Protein FUSfibril morphology depends on lengthFUS excited statesphosphorylation is site‐specific

Identifiers

PMID37399327
PMCPMC10831756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.