Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37399061›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology2023

Insulin feedback is a targetable resistance mechanism of PI3K inhibition in glioblastoma.

Evan K Noch, Laura N Palma, Isaiah Yim, Nayah Bullen, Yuqing Qiu, Hiranmayi Ravichandran, Junbum Kim, Andre Rendeiro, Melissa B Davis, Olivier Elemento and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. A renaissance in targeting the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2026
    Review
  6. The functional imperative in high-grade glioma.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Evan K NochDivision of Neuro-oncology, Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4561-1169
Laura N PalmaSandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Department of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Isaiah YimSandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Department of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Nayah BullenSandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Department of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Yuqing QiuDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Hiranmayi RavichandranDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Junbum KimDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Andre RendeiroResearch Center for Molecular Medicine of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Melissa B DavisDepartment of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Olivier ElementoDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
David J PisapiaDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Kevin ZhaiDivision of Neuro-oncology, Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Hongbiao Carl LeKayeDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Jason A KoutcherDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Patrick Y WenDana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Keith L LigonDana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Lewis C CantleyDana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Cornell University · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USAustrian Academy of Sciences · ATHarvard University · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Targeting the Vasular SystemP50CA165962 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI WENDY Beth LONDON · 2013 to 2026
$33.5M
Role of Phosphoinositides and Protein Kinases in the control of Cancer MetabolismR35CA197588 · NCI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI LEWIS C. CANTLEY · 2016 to 2026
$10.2M
Targeting Cysteine Susceptibility in GlioblastomaK08NS128263 · NINDS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI Evan K. Noch · 2022 to 2026
$1.1M
Horizontal Bore 9.4T Magnet for MRIS10OD023669 · OD · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI KOUTCHER, JASON ARTHUR · 2017 to 2017
$600k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P50 CA165962NCI NIH HHS R35 CA197588NIH HHS K08 NS128263NIH HHS S10 OD023669NINDS NIH HHS K08 NS128263
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInsulin feedback is a critical mechanism responsible for the poor clinical efficacy of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibition in cancer, and hyperglycemia is an independent factor associated with poor prognosis in glioblastoma (GBM). We investigated combination anti-hyperglycemic therapy in a mouse model of GBM and evaluated the association of glycemic control in clinical trial data from patients with GBM.

methodsThe effect of the anti-hyperglycemic regimens, metformin and the ketogenic diet, was evaluated in combination with PI3K inhibition in patient-derived GBM cells and in an orthotopic GBM mouse model. Insulin feedback and the immune microenvironment were retrospectively evaluated in blood and tumor tissue from a Phase 2 clinical trial of buparlisib in patients with recurrent GBM.

resultsWe found that PI3K inhibition induces hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia in mice and that combining metformin with PI3K inhibition improves the treatment efficacy in an orthotopic GBM xenograft model. Through examination of clinical trial data, we found that hyperglycemia was an independent factor associated with poor progression-free survival in patients with GBM. We also found that PI3K inhibition increased insulin receptor activation and T-cell and microglia abundance in tumor tissue from these patients.

conclusionReducing insulin feedback improves the efficacy of PI3K inhibition in GBM in mice, and hyperglycemia worsens progression-free survival in patients with GBM treated with PI3K inhibition. These findings indicate that hyperglycemia is a critical resistance mechanism associated with PI3K inhibition in GBM and that anti-hyperglycemic therapy may enhance PI3K inhibitor efficacy in GBM patients.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaHyperglycemiaMetforminAnimalsCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationFeedbackHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinMicePhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasePhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesRetrospective StudiesTumor MicroenvironmentHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinMetforminPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasePhosphatidylinositol 3-Kinasesglioblastomahyperglycemiainsulinmetforminphosphatidylinositol 3-kinase

Identifiers

PMID37399061
PMCPMC10708938
OpenAlexW4382918316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.