Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37398996›Full record

ArticleClinical transplantation2023

Social network interventions to reduce race disparities in living kidney donation: Design and rationale of the friends and family of kidney transplant patients study (FFKTPS).

Jonathan Daw, Ashton M Verdery, Selena E Ortiz, Rhiannon Deierhoi Reed, Jayme E Locke, Robert R Redfield, David Kloda, Michel Liu, Heather Mentch, Deirdre Sawinski and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical transplantation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Gender Differences in Willingness to Be Evaluated for Living Kidney Donation.Progress in transplantation (Aliso Viejo, Calif.) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan DawDepartment of Sociology & Criminology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.
Ashton M VerderyDepartment of Sociology & Criminology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.
Selena E OrtizDepartment of Health Policy & Administration, Pennsylvania State University, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Rhiannon Deierhoi ReedDepartment of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Jayme E LockeDepartment of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Robert R RedfieldDepartment of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.
David KlodaDepartment of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2959-4960
Michel LiuDepartment of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.
Heather MentchDepartment of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.
Deirdre SawinskiDepartment of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7903-8295
Diego AguilarUnaffiliated researcher, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.
Nathaniel D PorterUniversity Libraries and Department of Sociology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0479-6777
Mary K RobertsDepartment of Sociology & Criminology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.
Katie McIntyreDepartment of Sociology, Birmingham-Southern College, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Peter P ReeseDepartment of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.
Cornell University · USPennsylvania State University · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USBirmingham–Southern College · USUnder Armour (United States) · US

Funding

Population Research InstituteR24HD041025 · NICHD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY-UNIV PARK · PI MATTHEWS, STEPHEN A · 2001 to 2016
$9.7M
The Population Research Institute: Development CoreP2CHD041025 · NICHD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI Brian Thiede · 2016 to 2026
$9.0M
Social Network Interventions to Reduce Race Disparities in Living Kidney DonationR01DK114888 · NIDDK · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI DAW, JONATHAN KYLE · 2017 to 2021
$1.2M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD041025NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD041025NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK114888
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRacial/ethnic disparities in living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) are a persistent challenge. Although nearly all directed donations are from members of patients' social networks, little is known about which social network members take steps toward living kidney donation, which do not, and what mechanisms contribute to racial/ethnic LDKT disparities.

methodsWe describe the design and rationale of the Friends and Family of Kidney Transplant Patients Study, a factorial experimental fielding two interventions designed to promote LKD discussions. Participants are kidney transplant candidates at two centers who are interviewed and delivered an intervention by trained center research coordinators. The search intervention advises patients on which social network members are most likely to be LKD contraindication-free; the script intervention advises patients on how to initiate effective LKD discussions. Participants are randomized into four conditions: no intervention, search only, script only, or both search and script. Patients also complete a survey and optionally provide social network member contact information so they can be surveyed directly. This study will seek to enroll 200 transplant candidates. The primary outcome is LDKT receipt. Secondary outcomes include live donor screening and medical evaluations and outcomes. Tertiary outcomes include LDKT self-efficacy, concerns, knowledge, and willingness, measured before and after the interventions.

conclusionThis study will assess the effectiveness of two interventions to promote LKD and ameliorate Black-White disparities. It will also collect unprecedented information on transplant candidates' social network members, enabling future work to address network member structural barriers to LKD.

Indexed as

Kidney Failure, ChronicKidney TransplantationFriendsHumansKidneyLiving DonorsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTissue and Organ Harvestingliving donor kidney transplantationracial disparitiessocial networks

Identifiers

PMID37398996
PMCPMC10592276
OpenAlexW4382918833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.