To screen or not to screen: Exploring and addressing effective screening processes for trauma among forced migrants.

Background: Existing literature points to higher rates of trauma disorders for forced migrants than general or immigrant populations. The process of identification and screening for trauma in this population however is not straightforward and is actually controversial in some circles. Furthermore there are no definitive guidelines for mental health and social service providers on the "when" "who", "what" "why", "where", and "how" of trauma screening. Objectives: Importantly, few studies have included insights into the screening process from service providers and forced migrants themselves through participatory research methods. This study investigates effective screening processes for trauma and examines benefits and pitfalls of current practices from the perspectives of both migrants themselves as well as health service providers that serve them. Design: We used a qualitative approach to identify and analyze key themes from focus group interviews with key informants (service providers and trauma experts providing social and medical services in the community) and forced migrants (from Cameroon, Ethiopia, Honduras, and Tanzania). Results: Our results comprise forced migrant definitions of and approaches to coping with trauma, reservations about engaging with providers, positive experiences with and impacts of screening, limitations and negative aspects of screening, helpful screening practices, and effective tools and questions for screening. Conclusions: Drawing on these themes, we offer recommendations that may help inform future screening approaches and trauma-informed service provision. The study ultimately helps those in the field to reflect on current trauma screening practices for forced migrants and consider how new insights derived from rich discussions with migrants and their service providers may alter existing screening processes- which few.