Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37398843›Full record

ArticleEducational and psychological measurement2023

Fixed Effects or Mixed Effects Classifiers? Evidence From Simulated and Archival Data.

Anthony A Mangino, Jocelyn H Bolin, W Holmes Finch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Educational and psychological measurement, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anthony A ManginoBall State University, Muncie, IN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2699-9989
Jocelyn H BolinBall State University, Muncie, IN, USA.
W Holmes FinchBall State University, Muncie, IN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0393-2906

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study seeks to compare fixed and mixed effects models for the purposes of predictive classification in the presence of multilevel data. The first part of the study utilizes a Monte Carlo simulation to compare fixed and mixed effects logistic regression and random forests. An applied examination of the prediction of student retention in the public-use U.S. PISA data set was considered to verify the simulation findings. Results of this study indicate fixed effects models performed comparably with mixed effects models across both the simulation and PISA examinations. Results broadly suggest that researchers should be cognizant of the type of predictors and data structure being used, as these factors carried more weight than did the model type.

Indexed as

mixed effects modelsMonte Carlo simulationpredictive classificationProgram for International Student Assessment

Identifiers

PMID37398843
PMCPMC10311958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.