ArticleCureus2023
Multiple Percutaneous Drainage of a Giant Pyonephrosis Caused by Urolithiasis: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Giant Pyonephrosis Diagnosed Using POCUS in a Resource-Limited Setting.POCUS journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prevalence of kidney stones continues to rise in modern times. Undiagnosed and/or mistreated, it can result in suppurative kidney damage and, in rare instances, death from systemic infection. We present the case of a 40-year-old woman who presented to the county hospital for sleight left lumbar pain, fever, and pyuria for about two weeks. Ultrasound and CT scan revealed a giant hydronephrosis with no visible parenchyma, secondary to a stone in the pelvic-ureteral junction. Although a nephrostomy stent was placed, 48 hours later the purulent content was not evacuated completely. She was referred to a tertiary center, where two more nephrostomy tubes were placed to completely evacuate approximately 3 L of purulent urine. Three weeks later, after the inflammation parameters normalized, a nephrectomy was performed with good outcomes. A pyonephrosis urologic emergency can develop into septic shock, demanding rapid medical attention to prevent potentially fatal outcomes. In some circumstances, percutaneous draining of a purulent collection may not be sufficient to remove the whole purulent mass. Before nephrectomy, all collections must be removed with further percutaneous procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.