Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37398744›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Compliance With the World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist at a Tertiary Care Hospital: A Closed Loop Audit Study.

Hamza K Toru, Zahid Aman, Muhammad Haider Ali, Waqas Kundi, Muhammad A Khan, Fawad Ali, Shandana Khan, Muhammad J Zahid, Zaka Ullah Jan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hamza K ToruGeneral Surgery, Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar, PAK.
Zahid AmanGeneral Surgery, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, PAK.
Muhammad Haider AliGeneral Surgery, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, PAK.
Waqas KundiGeneral Surgery, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, PAK.
Muhammad A KhanSurgery, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, PAK.
Fawad AliGeneral Surgery, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, PAK.
Shandana KhanGeneral Surgery, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, PAK.
Muhammad J ZahidGeneral Surgery, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, PAK.
Zaka Ullah JanGeneral Surgery, Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar, PAK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveThe WHO launched the "Safe Surgery Saves Lives" campaign in 2008 to improve patient safety during surgery. The campaign includes the use of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist, which has been proven effective in reducing complications and mortality rates in several studies. This article discusses a clinical audit at a tertiary healthcare facility that assesses compliance with all three components of the checklist to minimize errors and improve safety standards. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis prospective, observational, closed-loop clinical audit study was conducted at Hayatabad Medical Complex, a tertiary care public sector hospital located in Peshawar, Pakistan. The audit aimed to assess compliance with the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist. The first phase of the audit cycle commenced on October 5, 2022, and involved collecting data from 91 surgical cases in randomly selected operating rooms. Following the completion of the first phase on December 13, 2022, an educational intervention was then conducted on December 15 to underscore the significance of adhering to the checklist, and the second phase of data collection began the following day, ending on February 22, 2023. The results were analyzed using SPSS Statistics version 27.0.

resultsThe first phase of the audit showed that there was poor compliance with the latter two parts of the checklist. Certain components of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist were well-complied with, including patient identity confirmation (95.6%), obtaining informed consent (94.5%), and counting of sponges and instruments (95.6%), while the lowest compliance rates were in recording allergies (26.3%), assessing blood loss risk (15.3%), introducing team members (62.6%), and inquiring about patient recovery concerns (64.8%, 34%, and 20.8% for surgeons, anesthetists, and nurses, respectively). In the second phase, after an educational intervention, compliance with the checklist improved significantly, particularly for those components with low compliance rates in the first phase, marking recording allergies (89.0%), introducing team members 91.2%), and inquiring about patient recovery concerns (79.1%, 73.6%, and 70.3% for surgeons, anesthetists, and nurses, respectively).

conclusionThe study showed that education is a critical factor in improving compliance with the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist. The study suggests that overcoming the obstacles to implementing the checklist requires a collaborative environment and effective instruction. It emphasizes the importance of adhering to the checklist in all surgical settings.

Indexed as

auditclosed loopcompliancesurgical safetywho

Identifiers

PMID37398744
PMCPMC10313906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.