ArticleStatistica Sinica2013
ACCURATE CONSTRUCTION OF LONG RANGE HAPLOTYPE IN UNRELATED INDIVIDUALS.
Article in Statistica Sinica, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Haplotype, or the sequence of alleles along a single chromosome, has important applications in phenotype-genotype association studies, as well as in population genetics analyses. Because haplotype cannot be experimentally assayed in diploid organisms in a high-throughput fashion, numerous statistical methods have been developed to reconstruct probable haplotype from genotype data. These methods focus primarily on accurate phasing of a short genomic region with a small number of markers, and the error rate increases rapidly for longer regions. Here we introduce a new phasing algorithm, emphases, which aims to improve long-range phasing accuracy. Using datasets from multiple populations, we found that emphases reduces long-range phasing errors by up to 50% compared to the current state-of-the-art methods. In addition to inferring the most likely haplotypes, emphases produces confidence measures, allowing downstream analyses to account for the uncertainties associated with some haplotypes. We anticipate that emphases offers a powerful tool for analyzing large-scale data generated in the genome-wide association studies (GWAS).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.