Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37398593›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2023

Baseline depressive symptoms as predictors of efficacy and tolerability of the treatment with duloxetine: a network analysis approach.

Julian Maciaszek, Tomasz Pawłowski, Tomasz Hadryś, Błażej Misiak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Julian MaciaszekDepartment of Psychiatry, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.
Tomasz PawłowskiDepartment of Psychiatry, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.
Tomasz HadryśDepartment of Psychiatry, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.
Błażej MisiakDepartment of Psychiatry, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Depression is considered one of the most prevalent and burdensome mental disorders. Only 50-60% of patients respond to first-line treatment. Individuals with depression might benefit from personalized treatment, tailored to the individual needs of the patient. In this study, we aimed to explore the baseline characteristics of depressive symptoms associated with a good response to duloxetine treatment using a network analysis. Additionally, the relationship between baseline psychopathological symptoms and treatment tolerability was assessed. Methods: The sample of 88 drug-free patients with active depressive episode, who started monotherapy with increasing doses of duloxetine were evaluated. The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) was used to assess depression severity and the UKU side effect rating scale to monitor adverse drug reactions (ADRs). A network analysis that explored interactions of specific baseline depression symptoms, treatment efficacy and tolerability was performed. Results: The node representing duloxetine treatment efficacy was directly connected to the nodes representing the first HAM-D item ("depressed mood") (edge weight = 0.191) and duloxetine dose (edge weight = 0.144). The node representing ADRs was directly connected to only one node representing the baseline score of the HAM-D anxiety (psychic) item (edge weight = 0.263). Discussion: Our findings indicate that individuals with depression presenting greater levels of depressed mood and lower levels of anxiety symptoms might better respond to the treatment with duloxetine in terms of efficacy and tolerability.

Indexed as

adverse drug reactiondepressiondepressive symptomsduloxetinenetwork analysistreatment prediction

Identifiers

PMID37398593
PMCPMC10312095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.