Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37398575›Full record

ArticleToxicological research2023

Comparison of structural characteristics and molecular markers of rabbit skin, pig skin, and reconstructed human epidermis for an ex vivo human skin model.

Chanyang Uhm, Haengdueng Jeong, Su Hyon Lee, Jae Sung Hwang, Kyung-Min Lim, Ki Taek Nam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicological research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Nanoparticles Loaded withPharmaceutics · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Rabbit model of a biofilm-contaminated, percutaneous orthopaedic endoprosthesis.OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chanyang UhmSeverance Biomedical Science Institute, Brain Korea 21 PLUS Project for Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-Ro, Seodaemun-Gu, Seoul, 03722 Republic of Korea.
Haengdueng JeongSeverance Biomedical Science Institute, Brain Korea 21 PLUS Project for Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-Ro, Seodaemun-Gu, Seoul, 03722 Republic of Korea.
Su Hyon LeeGLP Center, Biosolution Co., Ltd., Seoul, 06746 Republic of Korea.
Jae Sung HwangGenetics and Biotechnology, College of Life Science, Kyung Hee University, Yongin, 17104 Republic of Korea.
Kyung-Min LimCollege of Pharmacy, Ewha Womans University, 52 Ewhayeodae-Gil, Seodaemun-Gu, Seoul, 03760 Republic of Korea.
Ki Taek NamSeverance Biomedical Science Institute, Brain Korea 21 PLUS Project for Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-Ro, Seodaemun-Gu, Seoul, 03722 Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5292-1280

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development approved a reconstructed human epidermis (RHE) model for Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43188-023-00185-1.

Indexed as

EpidermisEx vivo skinPorcineReconstructed human epidermisSkin irritation testing

Identifiers

PMID37398575
PMCPMC10313609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.