ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2023
Rapid measurement and machine learning classification of color vision deficiency.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Color vision deficiencies (CVDs) indicate potential genetic variations and can be important biomarkers of acquired impairment in many neuro-ophthalmic diseases. However, CVDs are typically measured with insensitive or inefficient tools that are designed to classify dichromacy subtypes rather than track changes in sensitivity. We introduce FInD (Foraging Interactive D-prime), a novel computer-based, generalizable, rapid, self-administered vision assessment tool and applied it to color vision testing. This signal detection theory-based adaptive paradigm computes test stimulus intensity from d-prime analysis. Stimuli were chromatic gaussian blobs in dynamic luminance noise, and participants clicked on cells that contain chromatic blobs (detection) or blob pairs of differing colors (discrimination). Sensitivity and repeatability of FInD Color tasks were compared against HRR, FM100 hue tests in 19 color-normal and 18 color-atypical, age-matched observers. Rayleigh color match was completed as well. Detection and Discrimination thresholds were higher for atypical observers than for typical observers, with selective threshold elevations corresponding to unique CVD types. Classifications of CVD type and severity via unsupervised machine learning confirmed functional subtypes. FInD tasks reliably detect CVD and may serve as valuable tools in basic and clinical color vision science.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.