Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37398157›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023

No Replication of Direct Neuronal Activity-related (DIANA) fMRI in Anesthetized Mice.

Sang-Han Choi, Geun Ho Im, Sangcheon Choi, Xin Yu, Peter A Bandettini, Ravi S Menon, Seong-Gi Kim

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sang-Han ChoiCenter for Neuroscience Imaging Research, Institute for Basic Science, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Geun Ho ImCenter for Neuroscience Imaging Research, Institute for Basic Science, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Sangcheon ChoiAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA.
Xin YuAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA.
Peter A BandettiniSection on Functional Imaging Methods and Functional MRI Facility, NIMH, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Ravi S MenonCentre for Functional and Metabolic Mapping, Robarts Research Institute, Western University, London, Ontario N6A 5B7, Canada.
Seong-Gi KimCenter for Neuroscience Imaging Research, Institute for Basic Science, Suwon, Republic of Korea.

Funding

Investigating the Thalamic Regulation of Neuro-Glio-Vascular Restoration Underlying Acute Coma Recovery with Multi-Modal fMRI in a Brainstem Coma Rodent ModelR01NS122904 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI YU, XIN · 2021 to 2025
$3.2M
Investigating the neurophysiological basis of circuit-specific laminar rs-fMRIRF1NS124778 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BISWAL, BHARAT BHUSAN, BROWN, EMERY N · 2022 to 2022
$2.1M
Develop a multi-modal cross-scale fMRI platform with laminar-specific cellular recordings through multi-channel tapered photonic crystal fiber arrayRF1NS113278 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI YU, XIN · 2019 to 2019
$2.0M
Investigating the neurophysiological basis of circuit-specific laminar rs-fMRIR01NS124778 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BISWAL, BHARAT BHUSAN, BROWN, EMERY N · 2025 to 2025
$697k
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS122904NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS124778NINDS NIH HHS RF1 NS113278
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Toi et al. (Science, 378, 160-168, 2022) reported direct imaging of neuronal activity (DIANA) by fMRI in anesthetized mice at 9.4 T, which could be a revolutionary approach for advancing systems neuroscience research. There have been no independent replications of this observation to date. We performed fMRI experiments in anesthetized mice at an ultrahigh field of 15.2 T using the identical protocol as in their paper. The BOLD response to whisker stimulation was reliably detected in the primary barrel cortex before and after DIANA experiments; however, no direct neuronal activity-like fMRI peak was observed in individual animals' data with the 50-300 trials used in the DIANA publication. Extensively averaged data involving 1,050 trials in 6 mice (1,050×54 = 56,700 stimulus events) and having a temporal signal-to-noise ratio of 7,370, showed a flat baseline and no detectable neuronal activity-like fMRI peak. Thus we were unable to replicate the previously reported results using the same methods, despite a much higher number of trials, a much higher temporal signal-to-noise ratio, and a much higher magnetic field strength. We were able to demonstrate spurious, non-replicable peaks when using a small number of trials. It was only when performing the inappropriate approach of excluding outliers not conforming to the expected temporal characteristics of the response did we see a clear signal change; however, these signals were not observed when such a outlier elimination approach was not used.

Indexed as

direct neuronal activityfMRInoise distributionsample size

Identifiers

PMID37398157
PMCPMC10312747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.