Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37397973›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy2023

Flexible robotic endoscopy for treating gastrointestinal neoplasms.

Keiichiro Kume

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Development of therapeutic digestive endoscopy robots: a narrative review.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2024
    Review
  6. Robotics in interventional endoscopy-evolution and the way forward.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Keiichiro KumeThird Department of Internal Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu 8078555, Japan. k-kume@med.uoeh-u.ac.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Therapeutic flexible endoscopic robotic systems have been developed primarily as a platform for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in the treatment of early-stage gastrointestinal cancer. Since ESD can only be performed by highly skilled endoscopists, the goal is to lower the technical hurdles to ESD by introducing a robot. In some cases, such robots have already been used clinically, but they are still in the research and development stage. This paper outlined the current status of development, including a system by the author's group, and discussed future challenges.

Indexed as

Endoscopic submucosal dissectionTherapeutic flexible endoscopic robotic systemsTissue triangulation

Identifiers

PMID37397973
PMCPMC10308274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.