Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37397811›Full record

ReviewCurrent research in neurobiology2023

A framework and resource for global collaboration in non-human primate neuroscience.

Renée Hartig, P Christiaan Klink, Zlata Polyakova, Mohammad-Reza A Dehaqani, Igor Bondar, Hugo Merchant, Wim Vanduffel, Anna Wang Roe, Atsushi Nambu, M Thirumala and 7 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current research in neurobiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Renée HartigMax Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max-Planck-Ring 11, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
P Christiaan KlinkDepartment of Vision and Cognition, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, Meibergdreef 47, 1105 BA, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Zlata PolyakovaCenter for Human Nature, Artificial Intelligence, and Neuroscience, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, 060-0812, Japan.
Mohammad-Reza A DehaqaniSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Igor BondarInstitute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Hugo MerchantInstitute of Neurobiology, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Campus Juriquilla, Department of Neurophysiology, Querétaro, 76230, Mexico.
Wim VanduffelLaboratory for Neuro- and Psychophysiology, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven Medical School, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.
Anna Wang RoeInterdisciplinary Institute of Neuroscience and Technology, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310029, China.
Atsushi NambuDivision of System Neurophysiology, National Institute for Physiological Sciences, Okazaki, 444-8585, Japan.
M ThirumalaPrimate Research Laboratory, Central Animal Facility, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, 560012, India.
Amir ShmuelMcConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute, Departments of Neurology, Neurosurgery, Physiology, and Biomedical Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Vishal KapoorInternational Center for Primate Brain Research, Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 201602, China.
Katalin M GothardDepartment of Physiology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Henry C EvrardMax Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max-Planck-Ring 11, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Michele A BassoDepartment of Biological Structure and Physiology and Biophysics, Washington National Primate Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Christopher I PetkovBiosciences Institute, Newcastle University Medical School, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Anna S MitchellSchool of Psychology, Hearing and Speech, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.

Funding

Washington National Primate Research CenterP51OD010425 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Mari Ostendorf · 2012 to 2026
$201.8M
WaNPRC Macaca nemestrina SPF Breeding ColonyU42OD011123 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Richard Grant · 2012 to 2026
$34.4M
Visual Target Selection for Saccadic Eye MovementsR01EY013692 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BASSO, MICHELE A · 2002 to 2021
$7.0M
Changes across the lifespan in the use of heuristics to guide decision-makingR01AG063090 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BASSO, MICHELE A · 2019 to 2023
$3.8M
An Open Source, Wireless, Miniature Microscope for Monitoring Neuronal ActivityUF1NS107668 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BASSO, MICHELE A, GOLSHANI, PEYMAN · 2018 to 2018
$3.7M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY013692NIA NIH HHS R01 AG063090NIH HHS P51 OD010425NIH HHS U42 OD011123NINDS NIH HHS UF1 NS107668Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As science and technology evolve, there is an increasing need for promotion of international scientific exchange. Collaborations, while offering substantial opportunities for scientists and benefit to society, also present challenges for those working with animal models, such as non-human primates (NHPs). Diversity in regulation of animal research is sometimes mistaken for the absence of common international welfare standards. Here, the ethical and regulatory protocols for 13 countries that have guidelines in place for biomedical research involving NHPs were assessed with a focus on neuroscience. Review of the variability and similarity in trans-national NHP welfare regulations extended to countries in Asia, Europe and North America. A tabulated resource was established to advance solution-oriented discussions and scientific collaborations across borders. Our aim is to better inform the public and other stakeholders. Through cooperative efforts to identify and analyze information with reference to evidence-based discussion, the proposed key ingredients may help to shape and support a more informed, open framework. This framework and resource can be expanded further for biomedical research in other countries.

Indexed as

EthicsMacaqueMarmosetRegulationsRequirementsWelfare

Identifiers

PMID37397811
PMCPMC10313859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.