Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37397530›Full record

ReviewGenes & diseases2023

Emerging chemical engineering of exosomes as "bioscaffolds" in diagnostics and therapeutics.

Jianwei Wang, Meijiao Wang, Ning Jiang, Shijia Ding, Qiling Peng, Lei Zheng

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes & diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Preclinical assessment of genetically modified exosomes for colorectal cancer immunotherapy.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jianwei WangSchool of Basic Medical Science, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China.
Meijiao WangSchool of Basic Medical Science, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China.
Ning JiangMolecular Medicine Diagnostic and Testing Center, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China.
Shijia DingCollege of Laboratory Medicine, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China.
Qiling PengSchool of Basic Medical Science, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China.
Lei ZhengDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University/The First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510515, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

All cells release extracellular vesicles (EVs) as part of their normal physiology. As one of the subtypes, exosomes (EXOs) have an average size range of approximately 40 nm-160 nm in diameter. Benefiting from their inherent immunogenicity and biocompatibility, the utility of autologous EXOs has the potential for both disease diagnosis/treatment. EXOs are generally employed as "bioscaffolds" and the whole diagnostic and therapeutic effects are mainly ascribed to exogenous cargos on the EXOs, such as proteins, nucleic acids, and chemotherapeutic agents and fluorophores delivered into specific cells or tissues. Surface engineering of EXOs for cargo loadings is one of the prerequisites for EXO-mediated diagnosis/treatment. After revisiting EXO-mediated diagnosis/treatment, the most popular strategies to directly undertake loadings of exogenous cargos on EXOs include genetic and chemical engineering. Generally, genetically-engineered EXOs can be merely produced by living organisms and intrinsically face some drawbacks. However, chemical methodologies for engineered EXOs diversify cargos and extend the functions of EXOs in the diagnosis/treatment. In this review, we would like to elucidate different chemical advances on the molecular level of EXOs along with the critical design required for diagnosis/treatment. Besides, the prospects of chemical engineering on the EXOs were critically addressed. Nevertheless, the superiority of EXO-mediated diagnosis/treatment via chemical engineering remains a challenge in clinical translation and trials. Furthermore, more chemical crosslinking on the EXOs is expected to be explored. Despite substantial claims in the literature, there is currently no review to exclusively summarize the chemical engineering to EXOs for diagnosis/treatment. We envision chemical engineering of EXOs will encourage more scientists to explore more novel technologies for a wider range of biomedical applications and accelerate the successful translation of EXO-based drug "bioscaffolds" from bench to bedside.

Indexed as

Chemical engineeringDiagnosticsExosomesExtracellular vesiclesTheranosticsTherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID37397530
PMCPMC10311116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.