SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2023
Clinical diagnostic biomarker "circulating tumor cells" in breast cancer - a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Non-Invasive Diagnosis of Early Breast Cancer: Current and Emerging Liquid Biopsy Biomarkers.Cancers · 2026Review
- The assessment of breast cancer biomarkers in diagnosis, prognosis and treatment monitoring: integrated analysis.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2025Review
- Redefining cancer care: harnessing circulating tumor cells' potential for improved diagnosis and prognosis.Cancer cell international · 2025Review
- Potentialities and critical issues of liquid biopsy in clinical practice: An umbrella review.Translational oncology · 2025Review
- Exploring the Immunological Profile in Breast Cancer: Recent Advances in Diagnosis and Prognosis through Circulating Tumor Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Advancements in non-invasive biomarkers for detection and monitoring of breast cancer recurrence.Science progressReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Using meta-analysis, we evaluate circulating tumor cells(CTCs) as a potential diagnostic tool for breast cancer. Methods: A document search was conducted using publicly available databases up to May 2021. Specific inclusion and exclusion criteria were formulated and summarize relevant data through literature types, research types, case populations, samples, etc. Subgroup analysis of documents based on regions, enrichment methods, and detection methods. The included research projects were evaluated using DeeKs' bias, and evaluation indicators such as specificity (SPE), sensitivity (SEN), diagnosis odds ratio (DOR) were used as evaluation indicators. Results: 16 studies on the use of circulating tumor cells to diagnose breast cancer were included in our meta-analysis. Overall sensitivity value was 0.50 (95%CI:0.48-0.52), specificity value was 0.93 (95%CI:0.92- 0.95), DOR value was 33.41 (95%CI:12.47-89.51), and AUC value was 0.8129. Conclusion: In meta-regressions and subgroup analysis, potential heterogeneity factors were analyzed, but the source of heterogeneity is still unclear. CTCs, as a novel tumor marker, have a good diagnostic value, but its enrichment and detection methods still need to continue to be developed to improve detection accuracy. Therefore, CTCs can be used as an auxiliary means of early detection, which is helpful to the diagnosis and screening of breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.