ArticleDEN open2024
Development of a new gastrointestinal endoscope forceps plug that can minimize gas leakage.
Article in DEN open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aims: In our previous study, we visualized and systematically evaluated gas leakage from the forceps plug of the gastrointestinal endoscope system using the Schlieren system. In order to minimize the potential risk of infection from gas leakage from the gastrointestinal endoscope, the development of a new forceps plug was considered urgent. In this study, we analyzed the structure of commercially available forceps plugs and attempted to develop new forceps plugs with improvements. Methods: Microfocus computed tomography was used to nondestructively analyze the structural changes that occur when forceps are inserted into a commercially available forceps plug. Based on the findings, the basic structure of the newly developed forceps plug was set. We examined the airtightness of these newly developed plugs using the Schlieren system and also compared their fractional resistance with those of commercially available plugs. Results: As a result of the nondestructive analysis, all of the commercially available plugs had a single valve, and the cleavage created in the valve during forceps, insertion was large in the case of plugs with slit-type entrances. In the newly developed forceps plugs, all four types of plugs showed less gas leakage and similar or better usability compared to the commercially available plugs. Conclusions: The structural weaknesses of the existing gastrointestinal endoscopic forceps plugs were identified. Based on the findings, we froze the design of a prototype of a new forceps plug that was airtight and not inferior in usability compared to commercially available plugs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.