Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37397344›Full record

ReviewDEN open2024

Current status of artificial intelligence analysis for the treatment of pancreaticobiliary diseases using endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Takamichi Kuwahara, Kazuo Hara, Nobumasa Mizuno, Shin Haba, Nozomi Okuno, Toshitaka Fukui, Minako Urata, Yoshitaro Yamamoto

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in DEN open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Takamichi KuwaharaDepartment of Gastroenterology Aichi Cancer Center Hospital Aichi Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8348-8926
Kazuo HaraDepartment of Gastroenterology Aichi Cancer Center Hospital Aichi Japan.
Nobumasa MizunoDepartment of Gastroenterology Aichi Cancer Center Hospital Aichi Japan.
Shin HabaDepartment of Gastroenterology Aichi Cancer Center Hospital Aichi Japan.
Nozomi OkunoDepartment of Gastroenterology Aichi Cancer Center Hospital Aichi Japan.
Toshitaka FukuiDepartment of Gastroenterology Aichi Cancer Center Hospital Aichi Japan.
Minako UrataDepartment of Gastroenterology Aichi Cancer Center Hospital Aichi Japan.
Yoshitaro YamamotoDepartment of Gastroenterology Aichi Cancer Center Hospital Aichi Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic and biliary diseases encompass a range of conditions requiring accurate diagnosis for appropriate treatment strategies. This diagnosis relies heavily on imaging techniques like endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Artificial intelligence (AI), including machine learning and deep learning, is becoming integral in medical imaging and diagnostics, such as the detection of colorectal polyps. AI shows great potential in diagnosing pancreatobiliary diseases. Unlike machine learning, which requires feature extraction and selection, deep learning can utilize images directly as input. Accurate evaluation of AI performance is a complex task due to varied terminologies, evaluation methods, and development stages. Essential aspects of AI evaluation involve defining the AI's purpose, choosing appropriate gold standards, deciding on the validation phase, and selecting reliable validation methods. AI, particularly deep learning, is increasingly employed in endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography diagnostics, achieving high accuracy levels in detecting and classifying various pancreatobiliary diseases. The AI often performs better than doctors, even in tasks like differentiating benign from malignant pancreatic tumors, cysts, and subepithelial lesions, identifying gallbladder lesions, assessing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography difficulty, and evaluating the biliary strictures. The potential for AI in diagnosing pancreatobiliary diseases, especially where other modalities have limitations, is considerable. However, a crucial constraint is the need for extensive, high-quality annotated data for AI training. Future advances in AI, such as large language models, promise further applications in the medical field.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedeep learningERCPEUSpancreas

Identifiers

PMID37397344
PMCPMC10312781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.