Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37397269›Full record

ArticleCerebral circulation - cognition and behavior2023

Reproducibility of regional structural and functional MRI networks in cerebral small vessel disease compared to age matched and stroke-free controls.

Daniel J Tozer, C Patrick Pflanz, Hugh S Markus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel J TozerStroke Research Group, Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom.
C Patrick PflanzStroke Research Group, Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom.
Hugh S MarkusStroke Research Group, Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abnormalities in structural and functional MRI connectivity measures have been reported in cerebral small vessel disease (SVD). Previous research has shown that whole-brain structural connectivity was highly reproducible in SVD patients, while whole-brain functional connectivity showed low reproducibility. It remains unclear whether the lower reproducibility of functional networks reported in SVD is due to selective disruption of reproducibility in specific networks or is generalised in patients with SVD. In this case-control study 15 SVD and 10 age-matched control participants were imaged twice with diffusion tensor imaging and resting state fMRI. Structural and functional connectivity matrices were constructed from this data and the default mode, fronto-parietal, limbic, salience, somatomotor and visual networks were extracted and the average connectivity between connections calculated and used to determine their reproducibility. Regional structural networks were more reproducible than functional networks, all structural networks showed ICC values ≥0.64 (except the salience network in SVD). The functional networks showed greater reproducibility in the controls compared to SVD with ICC values >0.7 for control participants and <=0.5 for the SVD group. The default mode network showed the greatest reproducibility for both control and SVD groups. Reproducibility of functional networks was affected by disease status with lower reproducibility in SVD compared with controls.

Indexed as

Functional connectivityMRIReproducibilitySmall vessel disease

Identifiers

PMID37397269
PMCPMC10313873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.