Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37397218›Full record

ArticleFood chemistry: X2023

Comparison of a portable Vis-NIR hyperspectral imaging and a snapscan SWIR hyperspectral imaging for evaluation of meat authenticity.

Abolfazl Dashti, Judith Müller-Maatsch, Emma Roetgerink, Michiel Wijtten, Yannick Weesepoel, Hadi Parastar, Hassan Yazdanpanah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food chemistry: X, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Hyperspectral imaging-based erythema classification in atopic dermatitis.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Abolfazl DashtiWageningen Food Safety Research, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Judith Müller-MaatschWageningen Food Safety Research, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Emma RoetgerinkWageningen Food Safety Research, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Michiel WijttenWageningen Food Safety Research, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Yannick WeesepoelWageningen Food Safety Research, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Hadi ParastarDepartment of Chemistry, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Hassan YazdanpanahDepartment of Toxicology and Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The performance of visible-near infrared hyperspectral imaging (Vis-NIR-HSI) (400-1000 nm) and shortwave infrared hyperspectral imaging (SWIR-HSI) (1116-1670 nm) combined with different classification and regression (linear and non-linear) multivariate methods were assessed for meat authentication. In Vis-NIR-HSI, total accuracies in the prediction set for SVM and ANN-BPN (the best classification models) were 96 and 94 % surpassing the performance of SWIR-HSI with 88 and 89 % accuracy, respectively. In Vis-NIR-HSI, the best-obtained coefficient of determinations for the prediction set (R

Indexed as

ChemometricsMeat authenticityPCAPortable HSISnapscan HSI

Identifiers

PMID37397218
PMCPMC10314175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.