ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2023
Efficacy and safety of subcutaneous immunotherapy in asthmatic children allergic to house dust mite: a meta-analysis and systematic review.
Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of allergen-specific immunotherapy for allergic asthma: a meta-analysis comparing sublingual and subcutaneous routes across allergen types and age groups.Annals of medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Subcutaneous Allergen Immunotherapy in Adults Allergic to House Dust Mites: A Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trial.Allergy · 2025Trial
- Impact of Allergen-Specific Subcutaneous Immunotherapy on 12-Month Health-Related Quality of Life in Children and Their Parental Caregivers.Allergy, asthma & immunology research · 2026Article
- Safety and Effectiveness of Subcutaneous Immunotherapy with a Glutaraldehyde-Polymerized Mite Allergen Extract in Adults and Children with Allergic Rhinitis with or Without Asthma Due toDiseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Patient preference in allergen immunotherapy - Understanding the patient's view.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2025Article
- What has changed with subcutaneous immunotherapy against house dust mites? Eight-year, single-center real-world data.Asia Pacific allergy · 2025Article
- The Impact of the Indoor Environment on Childhood Asthma.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2025Review
- Biotoxicity of essential oil ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Advancing paediatric allergy care: key findings from the largest trial of house dust mite sublingual immunotherapy-tablets in children.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2025Article
- Optimization of Basophil Activation Test in the Diagnosis and Qualification for Allergen-Specific Immunotherapy in Children with Respiratory Allergy to the House Dust MiteInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus proteins and their role in the diagnostics and management of house dust mite allergy: exploring allergenic components.Postepy dermatologii i alergologii · 2024Review
- The Prevention of House Dust Mite Allergies in Pediatric Asthma.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Efficacy and safety of subcutaneous immunotherapy in asthmatic children allergic to house dust mite: a meta-analysis and systematic review.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) has been proved to be effective and safe in adult asthma. But it is still controversial in children. Object: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of SCIT in asthmatic children with allergy to house dust mite. Method: We searched the databases of Cochrane Library, EMBASE and MEDLINE (from 1 January 1990 to 1 December 2022). Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data and critically appraised the risk of bias. We used the Revman 5 to synthesize the effect sizes. Results: We finally selected 38 eligible studies including 21 randomized controlled trials to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SCIT and 17 observational studies to assess the safety. The results revealed that short-term asthma symptom scores were declined with a standardized mean difference (SMD) of -1.19 (95% CI: -1.87, -0.50) in 12 researches with high heterogeneity. Short-term asthma medication scores were decreased with SMD -1.04 (95% CI: -1.54, -0.54) in 12 heterogeneous researches. One study showed no significant reduction in combined symptom and medication scores without providing details. No studies we reviewed reported long-term efficacy. SCIT resulted in an obviously increased risk of adverse reactions compared with placebo. For secondary outcomes, SCIT improved life quality and reduced the numbers of annual asthma attacks and allergen-specific airway hyperreactivity, but without significant improvement in pulmonary function, asthma control or hospitalization. Conclusions: SCIT can reduce the short-term symptom scores and medication scores regardless of different treatment duration or mono/polysensitization, but with an increased incidence of local and systemic adverse effects. Further studies on pediatric asthma are needed to evaluate the long-term efficacy, and clarify the effectiveness of SCIT in specific population using mix allergen extracts or with severe asthma. Overall, it is recommended for children with mild-moderate HDM-driven allergic asthma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.