Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37397132›Full record

ArticleThe Analysis of verbal behavior2023

Stimulus Clarity and the Emission of Descriptive Autoclitics.

Thom Ratkos, Aubrey McFayden, Anne Small

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Analysis of verbal behavior, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thom RatkosDepartment of Psychology, Berry College, Mount Berry, GA USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9059-2326
Aubrey McFaydenDepartment of Psychology, Berry College, Mount Berry, GA USA.
Anne SmallDepartment of Psychology, Berry College, Mount Berry, GA USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The autoclitic is among the least studied and most complex verbal operant named and described by Skinner. The descriptive autoclitic is one subtype, which among other functions can describe the strength of the response. If the clarity of the stimulus is one source of response strength for tacts, manipulating stimulus clarity should evoke different frequencies of descriptive autoclitics. In an experiment with adults, digitally distorting pictures of common objects predicted the relative frequency of descriptive autoclitics that accompanied tacts. The most distorted images evoked twice as many autoclitics as moderately distorted images, and low-distortion images evoked no autoclitics. We encourage other researchers to interpret Skinner's conceptualization of the autoclitic and its various forms and test them empirically to evaluate how their functional definitions can be clarified, refined, or altered. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40616-023-00184-1.

Indexed as

AutocliticsAutoclitic tactsDescriptive autocliticStimulus clarityVerbal behavior

Identifiers

PMID37397132
PMCPMC10313608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.