ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2023
Validation of a form for assessing the professional performance of residents in cardiology by nurses.
Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is a strong need for transformation in our assessment systems from one that evaluates performance based on levels of training to another that focuses on professional competence to meet the expected requirements for the practice of the profession. The aim of this study is to validate for the first time a Spanish version of a new tool for assessing the professional performance of residents by nurses newly developed in the Ottawa Hospital (O-RON). MATERIALS AND
methodsAfter the author's written authorization, the original O-RON form was translated and cross-culturally adapted. Then we conducted a prospective observational study in two cardiology centers in the city of Buenos Aires. The validity of the tools was evaluated by the ability of the instrument to discriminate the level of experience of the residents according to their post-graduate year level. Data is expressed as percentages and frequencies of the qualifications obtained in the different questions. The chi-square test was used to assess the significance of the differences obtained. A generalizability test was used to evaluate reliability. Feasibility was defined as a minimum of 4 assessments per resident per evaluation round. Satisfaction of evaluators was assessed using a survey with a 10-point scale designed by the authors.
resultsA total of 838 evaluations were performed. Regarding validity, the 15-item form could significantly discriminate the experience of the residents according to their postgraduate year level (
conclusionThe Spanish version of the O-RON form can provide residents with a valuable source of feedback from the eyes of nurses on important aspects of their professional training. This tool, positively assessed by the raters, significantly discriminates residents' experience. Its implementation is feasible in our environment, and it is user-friendly, though it requires a considerable number of assessments to achieve high reliability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.