Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37396887›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2023

Tools for faculty assessment of interdisciplinary competencies of healthcare students: an integrative review.

Sharon Brownie, Denise Blanchard, Isaac Amankwaa, Patrick Broman, Marrin Haggie, Carlee Logan, Amy Pearce, Kesava Sampath, Ann-Rong Yan, Patrea Andersen

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sharon BrownieSchool of Health Sciences, Swinburne University, Hawthorn, QLD, Australia.
Denise BlanchardSchool of Nursing, Eastern Institute of Technology - Te Pukenga, Hawkes Bay, New Zealand.
Isaac AmankwaaCentre for Health and Social Practice and Centre for Sports Science and Human Performance, Waikato Institute of Technology - Te Pukenga, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Patrick BromanCentre for Health and Social Practice and Centre for Sports Science and Human Performance, Waikato Institute of Technology - Te Pukenga, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Marrin HaggieCentre for Health and Social Practice and Centre for Sports Science and Human Performance, Waikato Institute of Technology - Te Pukenga, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Carlee LoganCentre for Health and Social Practice and Centre for Sports Science and Human Performance, Waikato Institute of Technology - Te Pukenga, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Amy PearceCentre for Health and Social Practice and Centre for Sports Science and Human Performance, Waikato Institute of Technology - Te Pukenga, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Kesava SampathCentre for Health and Social Practice and Centre for Sports Science and Human Performance, Waikato Institute of Technology - Te Pukenga, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Ann-Rong YanFaculty of Health, University of Canberra, Canberra, NSW, Australia.
Patrea AndersenCentre for Health and Social Practice and Centre for Sports Science and Human Performance, Waikato Institute of Technology - Te Pukenga, Hamilton, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasingly, interprofessional teamwork is required for the effective delivery of public health services in primary healthcare settings. Interprofessional competencies should therefore be incorporated within all health and social service education programs. Educational innovation in the development of student-led clinics (SLC) provides a unique opportunity to assess and develop such competencies. However, a suitable assessment tool is needed to appropriately assess student progression and the successful acquisition of competencies. This study adopts an integrative review methodology to locate and review existing tools utilized by teaching faculty in the assessment of interprofessional competencies in pre-licensure healthcare students. A limited number of suitable assessment tools have been reported in the literature, as highlighted by the small number of studies included. Findings identify use of existing scales such as the Interprofessional Socialization and Valuing Scale (ISVS) and the McMaster Ottawa Scale with Team Observed Structured Clinical Encounter (TOSCE) tools plus a range of other approaches, including qualitative interviews and escape rooms. Further research and consensus are needed for the development of teaching and assessment tools appropriate for healthcare students. This is particularly important in the context of interprofessional, community-partnered public health and primary healthcare SLC learning but will be of relevance to health students in a broad range of clinical learning contexts.

Indexed as

assessmentcollaborationinterdisciplinary communicationinterdisciplinary educationinterprofessional relationsmeasurementprimary healthcarepublic health

Identifiers

PMID37396887
PMCPMC10314362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.