ArticleToxicology reports2023
Ocular safety of intravitreal ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA): An experimental feasibility study.
Article in Toxicology reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reversible Opacification of Intraocular Lens in vitro: Case Report.Case reports in ophthalmologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA) is a chelating component that is able to diminish oxidative reactivity and can be a potential neuroprotective drug in various ocular diseases. For assessing the safety of intravitreal EDTA, 10 rabbits were allocated and divided into 5 groups. Right eyes of the animals received intravitreal EDTA (112.5, 225, 450, 900 and 1800 µg /0.1 ml). Fellow eyes were considered as controls. Clinical examinations and electroretinography (ERG) were performed at the baseline and on day 28. The enucleated eyes were subjected to hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, immunohistochemistry for glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) test. Clinical examinations, H&E staining and TUNEL assay were unremarkable. The ERG test did not exhibit any significant alteration compared to the baseline values, except for a significant decrease in just one measurement of the eyes injected with 225 µg EDTA. The mean scores of GFAP immune reactivity in the eyes injected with 112.5 and 225 µg EDTA indicated a non-significant reaction. The scores in higher doses were significant. We suggest intravitreal EDTA with a dose threshold of < 450 µg should be studied for ratification of the safe dose.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.