ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2023
Is This Going to Hurt, Doc? Predicting Pain with Corticosteroid Injections for Upper Extremity Conditions.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification of factors related to pain from musculoskeletal injections.PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Pre-injection local anesthesia does not affect experienced pain in intra-articular hip injections.World journal of orthopedics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Corticosteroid injections (CSIs) are used in a wide variety of upper extremity pathologies for both diagnostic and treatment purposes. Many patients ask about pain associated with the procedure before agreeing to proceed. The purpose of this study was to correlate perceived pain tolerance and resilience with patient-reported injection pain during and immediately after injection. Methods: One-hundred patients indicated for a CSI for an upper extremity condition were recruited for the study. Patients completed a Brief Resilience Scale, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System pain interference form, and assessment of pain tolerance before injection. Physicians predicted pain tolerance and resilience for each patient. Immediately after the procedure, patients completed a second survey, assessing pain during and 1 minute after injection. Results: Physician-predicted patient resilience and pain tolerance was lower than that self-reported by patients. Pain with injection was inversely correlated with physician-predicted pain tolerance and resilience but not with patient-reported pain tolerance. Injection pain ratings did not correspond with patients' willingness to undergo subsequent injections. Conclusions: Procedural pain is an important consideration for many patients, especially in awake procedures. Appropriate counseling is crucial to support informed consent and enhance patient outcomes. This study demonstrated that a physician's clinical experience can be used to predict a patient's pain with CSI and should be considered when counseling patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.