Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37396668›Full record

ArticleFrontiers of ICT in Healthcare : proceedings of EAIT 2022. International Conference on Emerging Applications of Information Technology (7th : 2022 : Kolkata, India ; Online)2023

Deep Cervix Model Development from Heterogeneous and Partially Labeled Image Datasets.

Anabik Pal, Zhiyun Xue, Sameer Antani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers of ICT in Healthcare : proceedings of EAIT 2022. International Conference on Emerging Applications of Information Technology (7th : 2022 : Kolkata, India ; Online), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Data Characterization for Reliable AI in Medicine.Recent trends in image processing and pattern recognition : 5th International Conference, RTIP2R 2022, Kingsville, TX, USA, December 01-02, 2022, revised selected papers. International Conference on Recent Trends in Image Processing and... · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anabik PalSRM University, Amaravati, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh, India, 522502.
Zhiyun XueNational Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, 20894, USA.
Sameer AntaniNational Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, 20894, USA.

Funding

Machine learning and artificial intelligence research for clinical medical image processingZIALM010018 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI ANTANI, SAMEER · 2021 to 2025
$9.0M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA LM010018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical cancer is a significant disease affecting women worldwide. Regular cervical examination with gynecologists is important for early detection and treatment planning for women with precancers. Precancer is the direct precursor to cervical cancer. However, there is a scarcity of experts and the experts' assessments are subject to variations in interpretation. In this scenario, the development of a robust automated cervical image classification system is important to augment the experts' limitations. Ideally, for such a system the class label prediction will vary according to the cervical inspection objectives. Hence, the labeling criteria may not be the same in the cervical image datasets. Moreover, due to the lack of confirmatory test results and inter-rater labeling variation, many images are left unlabeled. Motivated by these challenges, we propose to develop a pretrained cervix model from heterogeneous and partially labeled cervical image datasets. Self-supervised Learning (SSL) is employed to build the cervical model. Further, considering data-sharing restrictions, we show how federated self-supervised learning (FSSL) can be employed to develop a cervix model without sharing the cervical images. The task-specific classification models are developed by fine-tuning the cervix model. Two partially labeled cervical image datasets labeled with different classification criteria are used in this study. According to our experimental study, the cervix model prepared with dataset-specific SSL boosts classification accuracy by 2.5%↑ than ImageNet pretrained model. The classification accuracy is further boosted by 1.5%↑ when images from both datasets are combined for SSL. We see that in comparison with the dataset-specific cervix model developed with SSL, the FSSL is performing better.

Indexed as

Cervix Image ClassificationDeep LearningFederated LearningSelf-supervised Learning

Identifiers

PMID37396668
PMCPMC10311633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.