ArticleArXiv2023
Second Sight: Using brain-optimized encoding models to align image distributions with human brain activity.
Article in ArXiv, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Two recent developments have accelerated progress in image reconstruction from human brain activity: large datasets that offer samples of brain activity in response to many thousands of natural scenes, and the open-sourcing of powerful stochastic image-generators that accept both low- and high-level guidance. Most work in this space has focused on obtaining point estimates of the target image, with the ultimate goal of approximating literal pixel-wise reconstructions of target images from the brain activity patterns they evoke. This emphasis belies the fact that there is always a family of images that are equally compatible with any evoked brain activity pattern, and the fact that many image-generators are inherently stochastic and do not by themselves offer a method for selecting the single best reconstruction from among the samples they generate. We introduce a novel reconstruction procedure (Second Sight) that iteratively refines an image distribution to explicitly maximize the alignment between the predictions of a voxel-wise encoding model and the brain activity patterns evoked by any target image. We use an ensemble of brain-optimized deep neural networks trained on the Natural Scenes Dataset (NSD) as our encoding model, and a latent diffusion model as our image generator. At each iteration, we generate a small library of images and select those that best approximate the measured brain activity when passed through our encoding model. We extract semantic and structural guidance from the selected images, used for generating the next library. We show that this process converges on a distribution of high-quality reconstructions by refining both semantic content and low-level image details across iterations. Images sampled from these converged image distributions are competitive with state-of-the-art reconstruction algorithms. Interestingly, the time-to-convergence varies systematically across visual cortex, with earlier visual areas generally taking longer and converging on narrower image distributions, relative to higher-level brain areas. Second Sight thus offers a succinct and novel method for exploring the diversity of representations across visual brain areas.
Identifiers
37396609PMC10312906W4382918686What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.