Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37396569›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in global women's health2023

Stigma towards women requesting abortion and association with health facility staff facilitation and obstruction of abortion care in South Africa.

Abongile Jim, Makgoale Magwentshu, Jamie Menzel, Stephanie Andrea Küng, Sa-Asa August, Justine van Rooyen, Rumbidzayi Chingwende, Erin Pearson

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in global women's health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04290832 (Developing and Testing Interventions to Address Use of Conscientious Objection to Deny Women's Access to Abortion Care in Mexico and South Africa), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04290832 naterminatednot on this map

Developing and Testing Interventions to Address Use of Conscientious Objection to Deny Women's Access to Abortion Care in Mexico and South Africa

TypeinterventionalSponsorIpasRan2020 to 2020Enrolled317ConditionsAbortion, Induced, Abortion, IncompleteArmsCO Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Abongile JimIpas South Africa, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Makgoale MagwentshuIpas South Africa, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Jamie MenzelIpas, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Stephanie Andrea KüngIpas, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Sa-Asa AugustIpas South Africa, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Justine van RooyenIpas South Africa, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Rumbidzayi ChingwendeIpas South Africa, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Erin PearsonIpas, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Abortion stigma has been shown to influence provider attitudes around abortion and may decrease provider willingness to participate in abortion care, or lead some to obstruct care. However, this link remains understudied. Methods: The present study uses baseline data collected through a cluster-randomized controlled trial in 16 public sector health facilities in South Africa in 2020. A total of 279 clinical and non-clinical health facility workers were surveyed. Primary outcome measures included: 1) willingness to facilitate abortion care in eight hypothetical scenarios, 2) facilitation of abortion care in the last 30 days, and 3) obstruction of abortion care in the last 30 days. Logistic regression models were used to assess the association between level of stigma as measured through the Stigmatizing Attitudes, Beliefs and Actions Scale (SABAS) and the primary outcomes. Results: Overall, 50% of respondents in the sample were willing to facilitate abortion care in each of the eight scenarios, with differences in willingness based on the abortion client's age and personal situation in each scenario. Over 90% reported facilitating abortion care in the last 30 days, but 31% also reported having obstructed abortion care in the last 30 days. Stigma was significantly associated with willingness to facilitate abortion care and actual obstruction of abortion care in the last 30 days. Controlling for covariates, odds of willingness to facilitate abortion care in every scenario decreased with every one-point increase in SABAS score (reflecting more stigmatizing attitudes), and odds of obstructing abortion care increased with every one-point increase in SABAS score. Conclusions: Lower abortion stigma on the part of health facility workers was associated with willingness to facilitate abortion access but not actual facilitation of abortion services. Higher abortion stigma was associated with actual obstruction of an abortion service in the last 30 days. Interventions to reduce stigma towards women seeking abortion, and particularly negative stereotyping, among Trial registration: Retrospectively registered on clinicaltrials.gov (ID: NCT04290832) on February 27, 2020. Plain english summary: The link between stigma against women seeking abortion and decisions around whether to provide, abstain, or obstruct abortion care remains understudied. This paper assesses how stigmatizing beliefs and attitudes towards women seeking abortion in South Africa affects willingness to facilitate abortion care and actual facilitation or obstruction of abortion care in practice. A total of 279 clinical and non-clinical health facility workers were surveyed between February and March 2020. Overall, half of respondents in the sample were willing to facilitate abortion care in each of the eight scenarios, with important differences in willingness by scenario. Almost all respondents reported facilitating an abortion procedure in the last 30 days, but one in three also reported having obstructed abortion care in the last 30 days. More stigmatizing attitudes corresponded to decreased willingness to provide abortion care and increased odds of obstructing abortion care. Results show that stigmatizing attitudes, beliefs, and actions toward women who seek abortion shape how clinical and non-clinical staff in South Africa feel about their participation in abortion services and whether they obstruct this care. Facility staff hold great power in determining whose abortions are facilitated and whose are obstructed, resulting in stigma and discrimination being openly perpetuated. Continuous work to reduce stigma towards women seeking abortion among

Indexed as

abortion (attitudes toward)induced abortionprovider attitudesSouth Africastigma and discrimination

Identifiers

PMID37396569
PMCPMC10311091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.