ReviewBiophysical reviews2023
On the concepts and correct use of radiometric quantities for assessing the light environment and their application to plant research.
Review in Biophysical reviews, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Light is one of the most important factors for photosynthetic organisms to grow. Historically, the amount of light in plant sciences has been referred to as light intensity, irradiance, photosynthetic active radiation, photon flux, photon flux density, etc. On occasion, all these terms are used interchangeably, yet they refer to different physical units and each metric offers distinct information. Even for experts in the fields of plant photobiology, the use of these terms is confusing, and there is a loose implementation of each concept. This makes the use of radiometric units even more confusing to non-experts when looking for ways to measure light, since they could easily feel overwhelmed by the specialized literature. The use of scientific concepts must be accurate, as ambiguity in the use of radiometric quantities can lead to inconsistencies in analysis, thus decreasing the comparability between experiments and to the formulation of incorrect experimental designs. In this review, we provide a simple yet comprehensive view of the use of radiometric quantities in an effort to clarify their meaning and applications. To facilitate understanding, we adopt a minimum amount of mathematical expressions and provide a historical summary of the use of radiometry (with emphasis on plant sciences), examples of uses, and a review of the available instrumentation for radiometric measurements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.