Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37396431›Full record

ReviewJACC. Asia2023

10 Years of SYNTAX: Closing an Era of Clinical Research After Identifying New Outcome Determinants.

Patrick W Serruys, Pruthvi C Revaiah, Kai Ninomiya, Shinichiro Masuda, Nozomi Kotoku, Shigetaka Kageyama, Yoshinobu Onuma, Marie Angele Morel, Scot Garg, Ted Feldman and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JACC. Asia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Review of Short- and Long-Term Outcomes.The International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Can the SYNTAX score predict mortality in patients with cardiac arrest?Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Patrick W SerruysDepartment of Cardiology, National University of Ireland, Galway (NUIG), and CORRIB Research Centre for Advanced Imaging and Core Laboratory, Galway, Ireland.
Pruthvi C RevaiahDepartment of Cardiology, National University of Ireland, Galway (NUIG), and CORRIB Research Centre for Advanced Imaging and Core Laboratory, Galway, Ireland.
Kai NinomiyaDepartment of Cardiology, National University of Ireland, Galway (NUIG), and CORRIB Research Centre for Advanced Imaging and Core Laboratory, Galway, Ireland.
Shinichiro MasudaDepartment of Cardiology, National University of Ireland, Galway (NUIG), and CORRIB Research Centre for Advanced Imaging and Core Laboratory, Galway, Ireland.
Nozomi KotokuDepartment of Cardiology, National University of Ireland, Galway (NUIG), and CORRIB Research Centre for Advanced Imaging and Core Laboratory, Galway, Ireland.
Shigetaka KageyamaDepartment of Cardiology, National University of Ireland, Galway (NUIG), and CORRIB Research Centre for Advanced Imaging and Core Laboratory, Galway, Ireland.
Yoshinobu OnumaDepartment of Cardiology, National University of Ireland, Galway (NUIG), and CORRIB Research Centre for Advanced Imaging and Core Laboratory, Galway, Ireland.
Marie Angele MorelDepartment of Cardiology, National University of Ireland, Galway (NUIG), and CORRIB Research Centre for Advanced Imaging and Core Laboratory, Galway, Ireland.
Scot GargDepartment of Cardiology, Royal Blackburn Hospital, Blackburn, United Kingdom.
Ted FeldmanEdwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California, USA.
Arie Pieter KappeteinDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
David R HolmesDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Michael J MackDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Baylor Scott & White Health, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Friedrich-Wilhelm MohrUniversity Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heart Centre Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The SYNTAX trial randomized patients equally eligible for coronary artery bypass grafting or percutaneous coronary intervention using the Heart Team approach. The SYNTAXES study achieved a follow-up rate of 93.8% and reported the 10-year vital status. Factors associated with increased mortality at 10 years were pharmacologically treated diabetes mellitus, increased waist circumference, reduced left ventricular function, prior cerebrovascular and peripheral vascular disease, western Europe and North American descent, current smoking, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, elevated C-reactive protein, anemia, and an increase in HbA1c. Procedural factors associated with higher 10 years mortality include periprocedural myocardial infarction, extensive stenting, small stents, ≥1 heavily calcified lesion, ≥1 bifurcation lesion, residual SYNTAX score >8, and staged percutaneous coronary intervention. Optimal medical therapy at 5 years, use of statins, on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting, multiple arterial grafts, and higher physical component score and mental component score were associated with lower mortality at 10 years. Numerous scores and prediction models were developed to help individualize risk assessment. Machine learning has emerged as a novel approach for developing risk models.

Indexed as

CABGcoronary artery bypass graftingmachine learningPCIpercutaneous coronary interventionSYNTAX

Identifiers

PMID37396431
PMCPMC10308124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.