ArticleACS omega2023
Development of a New Sensitive Method for Lead Determination by Platinum-Coated Tungsten-Coil Hydride Generation Atomic Absorption Spectrometry.
Article in ACS omega, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Precise application of water and fertilizer to crops: challenges and opportunities.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Review
- Removal of Ni(II), Cu(II), Pb(II), and Cd(II) from Aqueous Phases by Silver Nanoparticles and Magnetic Nanoparticles/Nanocomposites.ACS omega · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A novel very sensitive and rapid analytical method was improved where gaseous lead formed was transported to and trapped on an externally heated platinum-coated tungsten-coil atom trap for in situ preconcentration. The analytical performance of the developed method with the graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (GFAAS) method was compared. All critical parameters affecting the performance of both methods were optimized. The limit of quantitation (LOQ) was found as 11.0 ng L
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.