ArticleACS omega2023
Effects of Hybrid Graphene Oxide-Nanosilica on Calcium Silicate Hydrate in the Simulation Environment and Cement.
Article in ACS omega, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Mechanisms of Graphene Nanoplatelets and Graphene Oxide in Regulating Pore Structure and Drying Shrinkage of Cement Mortar.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Elastic and Electronic Properties of Alkali Charge-Balanced Calcium Aluminosilicate Hydrate Nanocomposites: A First-Principles Study.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Dispersion of Graphene Oxide: Evaluating Ionic Surfactants for Nanocomposite Cement Applications.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Study on the Durability of Graphene Oxide-Nanosilica Hybrid-Modified Sticky Rice-Lime Paste.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A Review of the Impact of Graphene Oxide on Cement Composites.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This research aims to investigate the synergistic reinforcing mechanisms of chemically combined graphene oxide and nanosilica (GO-NS) in the structure of calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H) gels compared with physically combined GO/NS. The results confirmed that the NS chemically deposited on the GO surface formed a coating to keep GO from aggregation, while the connection between GO and NS in GO/NS was too weak to prevent GO from clumping, making GO-NS better dispersed than GO/NS in pore solution. When applied to cement composites, the incorporation of GO-NS enhanced the compressive strength by 27.3% after 1-day hydration compared to that of the plain sample. This is because that GO-NS generated multiple nucleation sites at early hydration, reduced the orientation index of calcium hydroxide (CH), and increased the polymerization degree of C-S-H gels. GO-NS acted as the platforms for the growing process of C-S-H, enhancing its interface bonding strength with C-S-H and increasing the connection degree of the silica chain. Furthermore, the well-dispersed GO-NS was prone to insert in C-S-H and induced deeper cross-linking, thereby refining the microstructure of C-S-H. All these effects on hydration products resulted in the mechanical improvement of cement.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.