ArticleExploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy2023
Facilitating human papillomavirus vaccination pathways by extending vaccination competencies to community pharmacists: A cross-sectional survey on the acceptability and expectations among healthcare professionals and parents.
Article in Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pharmacists' Role in HPV Vaccine Uptake Among Women: A Scoping Review of Interventions and Barriers.International journal of women's health · 2025Review
- Expanding vaccination competencies to community pharmacists: modelling the organizational and economic impacts of new human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccine pathways in France.BMC health services research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination coverage rate (VCR) remains low in France (37.4% in girls in 2021). The French health authority recommended in 2022 to extend vaccination competencies to additional healthcare providers (HCPs), including community pharmacists (CPs). Objectives: To understand the acceptability by general practitioners (GPs), CPs and parents of adolescents of extending vaccination competencies and to identify benefits and barriers of new vaccination pathways. Methods: This cross-sectional research used a qualitative and quantitative approach. For the quantitative survey, GPs, CPs and parents of adolescents eligible to HPV vaccination completed an online questionnaire. Participants were asked to imagine themselves in different pathways and evaluate them. Results: A total of 200 GPs, 201 CPs and 800 parents were included. The level of acceptability of extending vaccination competencies to other HCPs was high in CPs (86% rated ≥7/10), but low in GPs (35%) and intermediate in parents (61%). Parents ranked first (44%) a pathway where GPs prescribed while CPs vaccinated because GPs inspire confidence as vaccine prescribers (80%) and parents prefer to be informed on vaccination by them (80%). CPs ranked first (42%) a scenario where they vaccinated after invitation of adolescents from the French National Health Insurance Fund (NHIS). They emphasized the simplicity of this scenario (94%) and the potential increase of VCR (91%), but asked to be more informed on HPV vaccination (77%) and favored television (83%) for communication campaigns. Conclusions: GPs and parents, in contrast with community pharmacists, were only moderately supportive of the extension the vaccination competencies. Confidence in the HCP remains the primary factor for adherence to a vaccination pathway beyond the simplicity of the pathway. Training of CPs, traceability tool, support from authorities and communication campaigns are levers that will support CPs in their new role and contribute to increase parents' acceptability toward CPs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.