Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37396047›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2023

Competencies of the UK nursing and midwifery workforce to mainstream genomics in the National Health Service: the ongoing gap between perceived importance and confidence in genomics.

Catherine Carpenter-Clawson, Melanie Watson, Alison Pope, Kathleen Lynch, Tracie Miles, Dany Bell, Maureen Talbot, Aniko Varadi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Nurses' Genomic Knowledge, Attitudes, and Perceived Organizational Support: A Comparative Secondary Analysis of Genetics and Genomics in Nursing Practice Survey Data.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Scoping review of oncology clinical trials nursing: Roles, competencies, and evolving practice in cancer research.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2026
    Article
  9. Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Global Health and Genomics.The Nursing clinics of North America · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Developing Policy Infrastructure to Guide Genomics-Informed Oncology Nursing in Canada: An Interpretive Descriptive Study.The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Catherine Carpenter-ClawsonBristol Royal Hospital for Children, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Melanie WatsonSouth West Genomic Laboratory Hub, North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Alison PopeGenomics Education Programme, Health Education England, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Kathleen LynchGenomics Education Programme, Health Education England, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Tracie MilesNHS Southwest Genomic Medicine Service Alliance, Royal Devon and Exeter Foundation Trust, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Dany BellMacmillan Cancer Support, London, United Kingdom.
Maureen TalbotBritish Heart Foundation, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Aniko VaradiCentre for Research in Biosciences, School of Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The United Kingdom is recognised worldwide as a leader in genomics. The use of genomic technologies in the National Health Service (NHS) is expected to deliver faster and more accurate diagnoses, supporting personalized treatments to improve patient outcomes. The ambition of embedding genomic medicine in the diagnostic pathway requires involvement of the front-line clinical workforce, known as 'mainstreaming'. Nurses and midwives are the largest professionally qualified workforce in the National Health Service thus, it is anticipated that they will play key roles in mainstreaming. This study investigated the level of competence/confidence of practicing nurses and midwives to support mainstreaming and their perception of the importance of genomics in delivery of patient care. A literature review of genetics/genomics competency frameworks, semi structured interviews of lead nurses and stakeholders were conducted to identify relevant competencies needed for mainstreaming. These were then used to survey four cohorts of nurses (

Indexed as

competencieseducationgenomicsmainstreamingmidwivesNational Health Servicenursesworkforce

Identifiers

PMID37396047
PMCPMC10312078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.