Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37396023›Full record

ArticleClinical epidemiology2023

Agreement Between Self-Reported Information and Health Register Data on Chronic Diseases in the Oldest Old.

Pauliina Halonen, Esa Jämsen, Linda Enroth, Marja Jylhä

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical epidemiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pauliina HalonenFaculty of Social Sciences (Health Sciences), Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-0890-208X
Esa JämsenFaculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Linda EnrothFaculty of Social Sciences (Health Sciences), Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-6613-3154
Marja JylhäFaculty of Social Sciences (Health Sciences), Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To study the agreement on disease prevalence between survey data and national health register data among people aged over 90. Patients and Methods: The survey data were from the Vitality 90+ Study conducted among 1637 community dwellers and persons in long-term care aged 90 and over in Tampere, Finland. The survey was linked with two national health registers, including hospital discharge data and prescription information. The prevalence of 10 age-related chronic diseases was calculated for each data source and the agreement between the survey and the registers was estimated using Cohen's kappa statistics and positive and negative percent agreement. Results: The prevalence of most diseases was higher in the survey than in the registers. The level of agreement was highest when the survey was compared with information combined from both registers. Agreement was almost perfect for Parkinson's disease (ĸ=0.81) and substantial for diabetes (ĸ=0.75) and dementia (ĸ=0.66). For heart disease, hypertension, stroke, cancer, osteoarthritis, depression, and hip fracture, the agreement ranged from fair to moderate. Conclusion: Self-reported information on chronic diseases shows acceptable agreement with health register data to warrant the use of survey methods in population-based health studies among the oldest old. It is important to acknowledge the gaps in health registers when validating self-reported information against register data.

Indexed as

chronic conditionhealth registersprevalencereliabilitysurvey

Identifiers

PMID37396023
PMCPMC10312216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.