Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37396016›Full record

ArticleResearch and reports in urology2023

Women as Urologists in Saudi Arabia: Career Choice and Practice Challenges: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study.

Meshari A Alzahrani, Abdalah Almhmd, Muhammad A Khan, Feras Badriq, Budoor Salman, Zainab Y Aljaziri, Naif Alotaibi, Mohammad Alkhamees, Sulaiman Almutairi, Mohammad Shakil Ahmad and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research and reports in urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Meshari A AlzahraniDepartment of Urology, College of Medicine, Majmaah University, Al-Majmaah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-8504-7486
Abdalah AlmhmdCollege of Medicine, Majmaah University, Al-Majmaah, Saudi Arabia.
Muhammad A KhanCollege of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU-HS), Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-6379-590X
Feras BadriqDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, East Jeddah General Hospital, Ministry of Health, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Budoor SalmanDepartment of Urology, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard - Health Affairs, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-9987-9056
Zainab Y AljaziriDepartment of Family Medicine, Al Ahsa Health Cluster, Ministry of Health, Al Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-2818-9701
Naif AlotaibiKing Salman Bin Abdulaziz Hospital, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammad AlkhameesDepartment of Urology, College of Medicine, Majmaah University, Al-Majmaah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-8207-1870
Sulaiman AlmutairiDepartment of Urology, College of Medicine, Majmaah University, Al-Majmaah, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammad Shakil AhmadDepartment of Family & Community Medicine, College of Medicine, Majmaah University, Al Majmaah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-3941-7121
Sultan AlkhateebDepartment of Urology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There is limited research on whether women choose urology as a future career. Therefore, we aimed in this study to assess the influencing and challenging factors among female physicians in Saudi Arabia. Methods: We approached 552 female physicians, including 29 (5.2%) urologists and 523 (94.7%) non-urologists. A cross-sectional survey was carried out, which included five sections and 46 items to assess and compare the perspectives of (urologists and non-urologists regarding influencing factors to choose urology, challenges toward applying to urology, and challenges during and after urology residency. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS software. Responses were presented as frequencies and percentages, while associations were studied using the Chi-squared test/Fisher's exact test. A p-value of ≤ 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Out of 552 female physicians, 466 completed the survey. The survey items compared urologists and non-urologists among female physicians. Among both cohorts, the most influencing factors in choosing urology were the diversity of practice and urological procedures (p =0.002, p<0.001). There were no social barriers or challenges when applying for urology residency (p<0.001). Overall, the majority of female urologists reported a high level of agreement that they have more time to work at the clinic (55.2%), they are satisfied as they are currently being urologists (75.8%), satisfied with their current lifestyle (72.6%). They would choose urology again as a future career (58.6%). Non-urologist female physicians 326 (74.6%) think they are more likely to have experienced gender discrimination than urologists 15 (51.7%) (p<0.001). Female urologists were less likely to face social barriers when applying for urology residency than non-urologists (p<0.001). Conclusion: As urologists, we must understand women's struggles, such as gender discrimination, a lack of academic advancement, and a lack of mentorship. To foster women's careers in urology, we must understand their unique needs, provide adequate mentorship, exterminate gender discrimination bias, and improve mentorship.

Indexed as

challengesfemaleresidencySaudi Arabiatrainingurologywomen

Identifiers

PMID37396016
PMCPMC10314780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.