Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37395954›Full record

Observational studyMusculoskeletal surgery2023

Influence of subscapularis tendon reattachment after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: clinical findings and ultrasonographic evaluation of the subscapularis at 89 months mean follow-up.

F A de Boer, J H Pasma, P E Huijsmans, P E Flikweert

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Musculoskeletal surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

F A de BoerDepartment Orthopaedic Surgery, Reinier Haga Orthopedic Centre, Toneellaan 2, 2725 NA, Zoetermeer, The Netherlands. frisodeboer@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7395-1315
J H PasmaDepartment Orthopaedic Surgery, Reinier Haga Orthopedic Centre, Toneellaan 2, 2725 NA, Zoetermeer, The Netherlands.
P E HuijsmansDepartment Orthopaedic Surgery, Bergman Clinics, Rijswijk, The Netherlands.
P E FlikweertDepartment Orthopaedic Surgery, Reinier Haga Orthopedic Centre, Toneellaan 2, 2725 NA, Zoetermeer, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is commonly used to treat rotator cuff arthropathy. In the deltopectoral approach for RSA, the subscapularis tendon is (partly) detached. The clinical effects of subscapularis reattachment are still under debate. An observational study was performed to evaluate the clinical effects of subscapularis tendon reattachment on the mid- to long-term following RSA.

methodsIn this study, 40 patients for a total of 46 shoulders with a reverse shoulder prosthesis participated. Constant Murley Score (CMS), Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), Range of Motion (ROM) and abduction and internal rotation strength were measured. The integrity of the subscapularis tendon at follow-up was assessed using ultrasound. Outcomes were compared between three groups: repair and intact at follow-up, repair and not intact, and no repair.

resultsMean follow-up was 89 months with a minimum of three years. CMS, OSS, ROM and strength did not differ between groups. One-third of the initially reattached subscapularis tendons were still present at follow-up. No dislocations were reported.

conclusionThis study showed no clinical effects of subscapularis reattachment after reverse shoulder arthroplasty on the mid- to long-term.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, ShoulderRotator Cuff InjuriesShoulder JointFollow-Up StudiesHumansRange of Motion, ArticularRetrospective StudiesRotator CuffTreatment OutcomeArthroplasty, Replacement, ShoulderClinical outcomeReverse shoulder arthroplastySubscapularis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.