ReviewCurrent hematologic malignancy reports2023
Real-world Management of CML: Outcomes and Treatment Patterns.
Review in Current hematologic malignancy reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Asciminib in patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia: results from the Japanese subgroup of ASC4FIRST.International journal of hematology · 2025Trial
- Adapting UK Clinical Practise in Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia in Chronic Phase to Contemporary Management Recommendations: The ADAPT 2.0 Survey.European journal of haematology · 2026Article
- Matching-adjusted indirect comparison between asciminib and flumatinib as first-line treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia in China.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Apigenin as a Multitarget Anticancer Agent: Coordinated Inhibition of EGFR/MAPK and PI3K/Akt Signaling in Hematologic Malignancies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Imatinib outcomes in chronic myeloid leukemia across diverse health care settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Blood cancer journal · 2026Article
- Article
- Therapeutic Targets for Overcoming BCR::ABL1 Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Resistance in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.Oncology research · 2026Review
- Treatment response and survival outcomes with BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors in chronic myeloid leukemia: a retrospective study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Unmet needs and quality of life burden in chronic myeloid leukemia: results from a nationwide Italian real-world survey.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Fusions4U: a resource of validated and annotated gene fusions in 328 cancer cell lines.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Reviewing the lines of therapy-concept in cancer treatment: a survey study among physicians.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- MDM2 inhibitors induce apoptosis by suppressing MDM2 and enhancing p53, Bax, Puma and Noxa expression levels in imatinib‑resistant chronic myeloid leukemia cells.Biomedical reports · 2025Article
- Switching TKIs during CML therapy is frequent, mostly driven by intolerance, and does not affect survival: a prospective Quebec registry study.Blood cancer journal · 2025Article
- Novel targeted therapies in chronic myeloid leukemia.Pharmaceutical science advances · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewChronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a disease that previously signified a poor prognosis, but treatment options and outcomes have improved over the last several decades. Despite this, challenges remain in optimal management in clinical practice, as the characteristics in trial populations differ from patients who are treated in a real-world setting. This review describes recent updates in real-world treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with CML. RECENT
findingsSeveral analyses describing real-world practice patterns show that tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the most commonly prescribed agents in multiple lines of therapy. First-generation (1G) and second-generation (2G) TKIs are the most commonly prescribed, even in the third line and beyond. Third-generation (3G) TKIs are typically utilized in patients with resistant disease who are younger with fewer comorbidities. Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is utilized significantly less, given other treatment options available. The goals of treatment with CML have shifted to quality of life, cost savings, and treatment-free response (TFR). Despite clear guidelines for attempting TFR, discontinuation practice patterns remain inconsistent. TKIs are the mainstay of CML treatment, including those in later lines of therapy. In real-world practice, several challenges still remain with regard to optimal management. Specifically, ideal sequencing of treatments, side effect profiles of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), current role and timing of transplant, and adherence to recommendations for attempting to achieve a treatment-free response (TFR). A national registry could characterize these practice patterns in order to find ways to optimize care for CML patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.