ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2023
Gluteus maximus transfer for wound closure and treatment of abductor deficiency: a single-plastic surgeon series.
Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Surgical Treatment and Outcomes for Gluteal Tendon Tears.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDue to the increasing number of total hip arthroplasties (THA), the number and complexity of revision procedures are also on the rise. For complex cases such as periprosthetic joint infections with soft tissue compromise or for abductor muscle deficiencies, one of the treatment options is a gluteus maximus flap (GMF) that covers dead space and can help restore the failed abductor mechanism. The purpose of this study is to investigate the outcomes of a single-plastic surgeon's series of GMF procedures. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective review reports on 57 patients (mean follow-up 39.2 months) undergoing GMF transfers for abductor insufficiency on native hip (N = 16), for abductor insufficiency in aseptic revision THA (rTHA) (N = 16), for soft tissue defects in aseptic rTHA (N = 8) and for soft tissue defects in septic rTHA (N = 17) by a single plastic surgeon over a 10-year period. Revision-free survival and complication rates were assessed and risk factors were analyzed with Cox-regression analysis.
resultsThe reoperation-free survival rate of GMF for abductor insufficiency in native hips was 100%. GMF procedures for soft tissue defects in septic rTHA had the lowest cumulative revision-free survival (34.3%) and highest reinfection rates (53.9%). More than three prior surgeries (HR = 2.9, p = 0.020), presence of infection (HR = 3.2, p = 0.010) and resistant organisms (HR = 3.1, p = 0.022) significantly increased the risk of revision.
conclusionsGMF is a viable option for addressing abductor insufficiency in native hip joints. However, high revision and complication rates are reported for GMF in septic rTHA. This study highlights the need to clarify the circumstances for which the flap reconstruction will be indicated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.